This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
As such, it's both misleading and unethical to have AARP representatives criticize Humana marketing to current and prospective Medicare Advantage customers without full disclosure of the relationship between AARP and a major Humana competitor. The positioning of this in the opening paragraph describing Humana is particularly unseemly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blumantis (talk • contribs) 15:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like your complaint is with AARP, rather than with Wikipedia. If this relationship has been commented on by reliable, secondary sources, it could be mentioned in the article, but Wikipedia is not a platform for original research. With that in mind, what changes to this article are you proposing? Grayfell (talk) 20:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Humana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Humana/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I changed the rating from 'B' back down to 'Start' due to the overall lack of references and still too much of a degree of brochure-ish writing. Stevie is the man!Talk • Work 01:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Last edited at 01:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
I have just modified one external link on Humana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
