Contents

Talk:Innovation management

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Engineering Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Invention High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

A quote from the article - "By the cases of Nokia and Kodak filed for bankruptcy protection, which illustrates the managers played a decisive role of the enterprise innovation. Because of the important innovation of enterprises will affect the strategic decisions of the entire enterprise development. And the business managers in general mainly determine corporate strategic decision-making, so managers should have very keen insight discovery capabilities in order to meet customer needs, and they should be good at handling disruptive innovation. However, the past innovative ideas and methods have not a real sense of innovation, in order to respond to future market competition, companies need to be destructive management." What does that mean? Large parts of this article really need to be thrown out and replaced by something else.--Yinandjang (talk) 22:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• agreed. User:CIM2014 seems to be excited but also incoherent. Is there anything in what he added that we can use? humblefool® 20:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, I think just from the structure, the article content came from an essay or something, perhaps that they wrote. humblefool® 02:49, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This section is pure advertisement for universities offering courses in this subject and should be deleted. It contains advertisements such as this "The curriculum of the course is designed to give engineering, science and other technology-oriented students a strong exposure to core business management skills while providing in-depth exposure to a host of global innovation management issues. It was designed specifically for students who are looking to create a personal competitive advantage for today’s global job market". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinandjang (talk • contribs) 18:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The section 'Manage Complex Innovation' is mostly gibberish, and should be removed or completely rewritten. --203.39.56.36 (talk) 04:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Leo1pard (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]