This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
The improperly formatted first citation in the introduction (which in the reference list is a broken link) leads not to an "Afghan Karakul website" but to a catalog of karakul hats sold by a distributor in Pleasanton, California. What makes the "authenticity" of this site even more questionable is that one of the 3 hats for sale is a Karakul baseball cap being modeled by a woman. AnthroMimus (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An image used in this article, File:M.ALI JINNAH.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 November 2011
What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
In the African section there is this unsourced statement: " When worn properly, these caps are always slanted at an angle, and never placed straight on the head." This sounds like WP:OR. I will remove it if no one objects.IrishStephen (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In this article it is credited as karakul, in the article about Papakha the exact same hat is given as papakha. In an other article it might even be a swim cap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.87.197 (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Karakul (hat). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The etymology here seems suspect. The article says that the hat is named after the qaraqul sheep, but the article for the sheep says that the sheep is named after a city called Qorako'l, whereas the article for the city says its name is Uzbek for "black lake", not "black fur". Now, I don't speak Uzbek, but I do speak Turkish, which is closely related, and I can say that the Turkish for "black lake" would be『kara göl』while "black fur" would be either『kara kürk』or "kara post". There may some other Turkic word for fur that I don't know that is similar to kul, but the "black lake" explanation seems much more reasonable to be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.38.193.33 (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
