Contents

Talk:Kulitan

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Is this still being used?

[edit]

I'm half-Kapampangan and I have never ever heard of this script before. Is it really still being used in Pampanga? Jcdizon (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently used by many Kapampangan cultural enthusiasts, here is a page on facebook for starters, though needless to say many of those enthusiasts are not on facebook, still plenty of people on here. https://www.facebook.com/groups/Kulitkulitan/ --LakanBanwa (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As with Baybayin and other related script, this is abugida or modified consonants writing system and NOT alphabet? Twentius (talk) 08:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ako ay maganda 49.151.131.193 (talk) 02:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am an Austronesian linguist with a Ph.D. and was a presenter at the 13-ICAL in Taipei. I listened to the presentation by Michael R. Pangilinan (https://siuala.com/category/kulitan/) and his colleague with the username Nordenx (https://nordenx.blogspot.com/) about their creation of the Kulitan font, a la Japanese calligraphy. What is the difference between the 'historic' and 'traditional' ways of writing? Should the two words refer to the same? I think that Kulitan characters themselves are real and traditional; however, I am very skeptical about their vertical writing style because Mr. Pangilinan is much inclined toward Japanese culture, and it is possible that he spread this style, saying it is 'traditional'. I can never forgive if this is a cultural invention. Your insights are crucial to this scholarly debate. If you have any counterarguments, I invite you to share examples of the vertical writing style in traditional literature. 2404:7A82:3E40:8A00:2578:EB3E:611A:B8E6 (talk) 12:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]