This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Hello Otzma Yeudit is a political party who has nothing to do with this group. They may have affinity, but all that ends there. Why adding them in the infobox? Thanks for clarifying or removing. --Vanlister (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A number of their core members, Itamar Ben Gvir, Michael Ben Ari etc are core leaders in both. That said it’s synthesis of what are multiple Kahanist ideologue groups. If removed it should be added in a See also section. Shushugah (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find anything about Ben Gvir being a member of the group, or of a link with the political party, it is probably not a reliable information.
This on the article, is not supported by the sources cited : "Lehava is closely associated with the political party Otzma Yehudit, which is led by Michael Ben-Ari, the party shares its headquarters with Lehava in Jerusalem, ". without reliable sources this should be removed as it is a false information. --Vanlister (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
First they don't share their headquarters, the police led and investigation... Secondly, the "close association" isn't proven by the ToI article. I guess the journalist wanted to make a point claiming an [unofficial] affiliation, but as I said I can't find reliable information on that link. A. Not serious information shouldn't be included on Wikipedia. B. They are certainly not part of Lehava or heading it as claimed in the infobox. That's the main problem I found reading this article, and that was the reason of my comment.--Vanlister (talk) 11:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 December 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I've posted a vector image of the flag of Lehava, and I'd like to add it, but since I'm only autoconfirmed I cannot. I would like add the flag to the infobox of the organization. RowanJ LP (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done Lemonaka (talk) 07:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
