Contents

Talk:List of airports in Poland

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Poland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Airports This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the airport project.

I find adding the Danzig bit in this article ridiculous but will refrain from making changes against the vote's ruling. One thing i don't get is why the word German links to the Germanic language article and not to the German language one. Gdabski 13:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nobody knows that for sure since Chris 73 failed to explain that. Also, adding of "Germanic" names to all articles mentioning the city of Gdansk is just his invention and not the actual ruling of the voting. Check the Talk:Gdansk archives for more details. Halibutt 10:40, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Airports in Poland with paved runways is a new article, not linked from any other, and with a name that's rather unlikely to be typed into a search engine. It should be merged here. Comments?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While it is unlikely that anyone will search directly for this article by name, it is too long, I think, to be merged into List of airports in Poland. It is already prominently linked to from both the beginning and the ending See also section of the List article. I would just as soon leave things the way they are. People who want to know about Polish airports will find List of airports in Poland first, and then will navigate, if they so choose, to Airports in Poland with paved runways and Airports in Poland with unpaved runways. -- Mareklug ^talk 17:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. The lists are definitely too long to be added to List of airports in Poland. They are more of a specialized character and would overshadow the existing basic general information by its dimensions. In my opion this whole discussion started all too soon, while I was in the process of compiling information, not knowing how big it would get. It was easier to experiment within a separate article rather than fiddle around with an existing one. In my opinion I made the right choice. Thanks Mareklug! =) --Qqerim ^talk 19:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, considering how the article has grown recently, and the addition of 'unpaved' one I withdraw my merge proposal. Good job, Qqerim - just remeber to link your articles from others.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 01:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We should add Modlin International Airpoet to the list aswell as Lublin International Airport , even though they are under construction - but near the end , they should be added after their first full year. --Oliwier1111 (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 05.01.2012[reply]