This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
I have subdivided the list to make it a bit easier to read and edit. I think that this page would work well as a table, with columns for the date, location, and the victorious party. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The so-called "Battle of Raith" is a ludicrous fiction which brings Wikipedia into disrepute. It was the invention of a local newspaper editor who misunderstood the Battle of Catterick. This needs to be excised from the list or at the very least marked as a fabricationFreuchie (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In the First War of Scottish Independence section why are some knights given their honorific of 'Sir' while for others it is omitted? e.g. Sir William Wallace and Sir William Douglas have their titles ignored, while Sir Simon Fraser and Sir John Segrave have theirs included. Shouldn't this be consistent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.195.46 (talk) 08:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]