Contents

Talk:List of former comfort women

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / Japanese / World War II BL‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles BL This article has been rated as BL-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force World War II task force Korea Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups. Japan This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:18, June 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles

See also[edit]

User Phoenix7777 insisted to add the 'See also' wikilink to "Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager" which is not similar to the topic of this article about a list of victims/human rights activists. He still cannot give his reason. STSC (talk) 20:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? Both articles are about comfort women. Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager is about the life of comfort women. Are you claiming both articles are not relevant? Please note that WP:SEEALSO says the link should be relevant, not similar. Please provide a guideline which says "A link in See also section of WP:Stand-alone lists should not include articles other than WP:List article". Please stop pushing POV.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who's actually pushing POV here? I can see you're very keen to use the 'See also' to publicise your favourite book. We use common sense here, I don't think any reader with rational mind would also want to see you book when they come to this article to find out the victims of Japanese war crimes. STSC (talk) 03:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it to readers' decision whether they want to read the article or not instead of hiding the article from them like censorship by the Chinese government. No one care your common sense. The link is legitimate per WP:SEEALSO.―― Phoenix7777 (talk)

"Whether a link belongs in the 'See also' section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgement and common sense" as in WP:SEEALSO. Our common sense is to reject your attempt to use Wikipedia to spread your Japanese revisionist POV. STSC (talk) 10:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the link is legitimate per WP:SEEALSO. Our common sense is to reject your attempt to use Wikipedia to spread your Communist Chinese POV.―― Phoenix7777 (talk)

What's the point of this list - everyone listed is already covered in Comfort women. Batternut (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The comfort women article at time of writing is massive. I think having this list be separate would be useful/informative if more people contributed to it. toobigtokale (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]