| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lon Nol article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is about a topic whose name is originally rendered in the Khmer script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Khmer script. For more information, see: MOS:FOREIGN. |
Removed following section, did not make sense with rest of article. Earlier, it says that Lon Nol suffered a stroke in 1971. Here, it says Lon Nol became unstable/emotional after strike, and that after US move into Cambodia (1970), that Lon Nol broke down and cried in conversation with Haig. But US intervention was prior to his stroke.
Despite his ambitions, Nol was noted to be increasingly unstable and emotional, especially after his stroke, with a tendency to break down under stress. When, after the Cambodian incursion of 1970, Alexander Haig told him that American ground forces would not be used to assist the Cambodian army, Nol broke down in tears and emotionally claimed that Cambodia would be unable to defend itself.[1] 209.195.164.34 (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
References
I have just made an edit in this area to explain there is no evidence of CIA involvement in the coup. I am not sure how to put references in footnotes so I put three book references in the main text that support my claim. Silverneedle (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC) I have described the coup as "CIA-sponsored", which is both true and germane. An obstructive user who keeps censoring the article Khmer Rouge (which see, for the sordid details) deleted this addition without even being responsible enough to say why. Shorne 07:18, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)[reply]
How dare you accuse me of whitewashing articles when you understate the facts, grudgingly agreeing to "accusations" of CIA involvement when the evidence is no longer seriously denied by any non-revisionist? I suppose you also deny that the US funded the Lon Nol régime. Shorne 09:24, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
How did the US back Lon Nol, and do you have any proof of this? Rickyrab 18:59, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
... is a palindrome. Hmmm. Rickyrab 19:00, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This is a fantastic lie when dealing with an armed faction that was commanded and controlled by the Khmer Rouge. So far, Mr. Lopez has failed to provide any facts suggesting that Sihanouk had any real power with regards to the insurgency. The reason is because there isn't any such proof, and Ruy is just engaging in typical distortion. Though I find it somewhat odd that a user who has engaged in Apologia 101 for how 1.7 million deaths wasn't really the KR's fault would try and lie about how such a heroic anti-imperialist organization came to power. J. Parker Stone 04:20, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
CJK has changed all of the Lon's to Nol's. Cambodians, like most Asians, put the family name first, thus Lon is his family name, Nol is his given name. (His brother was Lon Non) It's very confusing given the unfamiliarity that most westerners have with Asian/Khmer names in general. So, I think that using "Lon" would be more appropriate (thus reverting most of CJK's edits). What do folks think? Sihanouk is different, that is his given name, Norodom is the family name, but most monarchs throughout the world are referred to by their "first" names. --Easter Monkey 02:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
According to newspaper accounts of the execution of Lon Non, it was said that he was calmly smoking a white pipe before he was executed. This same white pipe, was given to him by an uncle of mine when he was visting the Cambodian Embassy in DC during the early 70s. Whether or not the incident is the case, or if the white pipe is the same one given to him by my uncle, the account of it brings a chilling sadness to me.
It can be verified that Lon Nol experienced a stroke in February, 1971. It has been removed because of its non-neutral POV and its inclusion created a disjoint in its paragraph. Several attempts to add this information back in have resulted in paragraphs of a single sentence. If the stroke was dehabilitating enough to affect his governance, I would like to add a paragraph indicating such. Please add sources, I checked everything I had access to and was unable to determine what affect, if any, such a stroke had on him.
I've removed Lon Nol from the list of leaders who came to power through a coup. My reasoning is given below.
While the events of 1970 in Cambodia are often referred to as a "coup" by Lon Nol, the actual circumstances do not fit the definition of a coup. Lon Nol, in 1970, was the Priemer/Prime Minister of Cambodia and Sihanouk was head of state. Lon Nol (with a vote of the national assembly) removed Sihanouk from power through means consistant with the Cambodian constitution. I'm not denying that intimidation didn't occur during the process.
My point is that a Prime Minister deposing a head of state is not the same thing as the army taking over a country and (for example) a general assuming a political role which is the usual definition of a "coup".
As to this text: "The townspeople refused the government of Lon Nol's orders to remove the Prince's portrait, and they burned down the house of the new governor whom Lon Nol had appointed." Its very obscure as to which 'town' this incident took place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.63.44.232 (talk) 12:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
I've never before seen a claim that Nol was a sino-Khmer. Given that he boasted of his Khmer ethnicity to the extent of urguing his troops to call him "Black Papa" (based on the once popular term "black Khmer" to describe a pure Khmer) I'm deleting it. I note that the only possibly reliable source for the sino-Khmer claim is a dead link. Bigdaddy1981 00:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GenLonNol.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I noticed there was a gap in the former states of Cambodia so I created Kingdom of Cambodia (1975-76); any help in expanding this stub would be much appreciated. Cheers, walk victor falk talk 04:54, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The unsourced assertion that the Khmer Republic was founded 'to do away with [...] corruption' (which was added to the article, unsourced, in 2009) seems a bit dubious, particularly as some figures involved had already done rather well themselves out of the Sangkum regime. The causes of the coup, so far as they can be worked out, were:
The overriding 'aim' of the Republic was getting rid of the 30-40,000 (Shawcross) Vietnamese troops within Cambodia's borders. But I'm not sure it's helpful to think of states as founded with specific aims in mind anyway!Svejk74 (talk) 01:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
