 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 14, 2004, July 14, 2005, July 14, 2006, July 14, 2007, July 14, 2008, July 14, 2010, July 14, 2013, and July 14, 2019. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hmmmmm... I don't think this is a picture of Mars... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.220.139.80 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 14 July 2005
The following is listed in the entry "....shook the scientific community." Is there a source for this? Specifics concerning this aren't mentioned at all. Pgrote 20:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this probe now? Helocentric orbit or what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.121.234.90 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 8 April 2006
I'm a bit sceptical about the sentence: Images of craters and measurements of a thin atmosphere, indicating a relatively inactive planet exposed to the harshness of space, generally dissipated hopes of finding intelligent life on mars. Was there really any serious hope of finding 'intelligent' life on Mars just before the M4 probe? (As opposed to just the hope of finding 'complex' life such as plants and invertebrates). Ashmoo 01:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also the shook the science community' from the intro seems more appropriate for a pop-science article rather than an encyclopedia. The data gathered from M4 was well within the range of expected outcomes wasn't it? Ashmoo 01:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Shows that the pictures of the same resolution from earth would not give any proof for intelegent life on earth.--Stone 12:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]{{cite journal}}: Text "Science" ignored (help) Shows clearly that part of the science cmunity belived in life on mars, or even considered it being fact!--Stone 12:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]The page doesn't really address the 1967 recontact, only mentions the final lost of contact. Can someone put up some info about this? CFLeon 06:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article states the pitch/roll change was completed to "better than 1% accuracy". Shouldn't it read "better than 99% accuracy" or "better than 1% error" instead? Eridane (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC) I agree. The reference cited is a NASA document that includes the same error. Wikipedia's generally accepted policy is that we can't perform any original research, so we're left with having discerning readers figure this out on their own, or just read our comments!Raryel (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs a good copy edit. Should probably be a high prioity to-do. Schaffman (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sources 2 and 3 are dead links and need to be fixed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:4300:713:7D88:3D1A:ACB2:56EE (talk) 17:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The according data are lacking, as outlined in the frame on top of page ("This article contains orbital elements but does not include an epoch...").
The box on the right of the page (which I found no way to edit BTW) has a paragraph titled "Orbital parameters", which, despite the "Mariner 4" title of the page, recalls the MARS orbit. I suggest to make 3 paragraphs, "Earth orbital parameters", "Mars orbital parameters", and "Mariner 4 orbital parameters".
Even better if possible would be to add map(s) showing the 3 orbits, outlining the wide possible ranges for the distances between the 3 bodies involved.
Mars being, depending on Earth and Mars epochs, 130x to 1040x farther (from Earth) than the Moon, and the signal attenuation being accordingly from 17,000x to 1,080,000x bigger, data transmission between Earth and the spacecraft was a major problem in the Mariner 4 enterprise and exploit, in a proportion that potentially varies like from 1 to 60 in signal strength (I recall that the transmission of the 634KB of data took 19 days despite the use of an array of giant antennas spread over Earth continents). So this page really needs to show the distance Mariner 4 was from Earth at the moments of the flyby and of the main data transmission (from 15 jul 11:45 to 03 aug 1965).
Thanks a lot to the ones who would be able to add these precisions. Michel Merlin (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Add: I wrote to NASA who gave me the results, which I added in the main page at the start of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariner_4#Mars_flyby section Michel Merlin (talk) 18:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Mariner 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mariner 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Epoch data can be found at [1]. I'm not sure what numbers should be added to the info-box in the epoch field. GrahamCracker325 (talk) 13:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In the data box in the upper right of the page is an item called "Distance travelled". The item itself shouldn't even be there since the spacecraft is in heliocentric orbit and the distance travelled is constantly changing. At the very least, the value given (2,000,000 km, or 1,200,000 mi) is way off. At the time of the flyby the craft was 216,000,000 km from Earth. Maybe someone just left of a couple of zeros. MikePhysics (talk) 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
