This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Reverting non-consensual move formally rather than continue low-grade move-revert war. "Martin Maryland" was the name used by the RAF, who had the largest numbers of the aircraft. Most common name in published materials. Not used in US service. - BillCJ 17:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons.
Hi gang, since I am the doofus who has changed my mind continuously and been the sole change agent of the name, let me explain, the reasons for my changing the name. I know that the Martin 167 most often went by the designation "Maryland" in British service, but what was its name in French or other services? I believe that the Model 167 was the "Glenn" in France. I opted for the "Model 167" as it was common to all variants. Again, if you look at the history of the changes, you will see that there was no edit war intended, merely a "back-and-forth" discussion mainly with myself. FWIW Bzuk 04:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Actually, I was using "edit-war" somewhat tongue-in-cheek. However, I did move it back to Martin Maryland in between your two moves, which you must have totally missed! Anyway, this seemed like the best method to get a consensus, and I'll abide by whatever that is. Thanks. - BillCJ 04:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The official name in French service was Glenn Martin 167 A3. The Maryland name is probably more commonly remembered in the English-speaking world, but were the British really the main users of the type? French Glenns (as crews called them) did see quite a lot of action over France and, later, Syria. Anyhow, our energies would be better spend in expanding the "British operational use" section :) PpPachy 16:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link on Martin Maryland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Support - Per my nomination. - BillCJ 17:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
