This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
For several 'Notable ribbon racks', it is noted, '(foreign decorations not pictured)'. Foreign to where? I am assuming the owner's country. Should this be specified? Blaxcell (talk) 05:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like having ribbons for Harmon Rabb on this page is inappropriate. While all others belong to factual characters who fought in war, his is the only fictional set. I recommend it be removed. 174.0.56.57 (talk) 03:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In the "Notable examples" section, would it be an idea to list (and link to) the medals being awarded...i.e. have the graphics on the right and the text on the left. In order to avoid overwhelming, they could be hidden inside a {{collapse}} template. -- saberwyn02:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, wonderful! Many thanks indeed. PHALERISTICS is an alternative spelling I have discovered- that is the word I'd seen years ago. Thanks so much! Sorry, popped in to say, I am especially appreciative because, believe it or not, I had been unable to locate this term for YEARS. Even some experts did not know the name for it.Djathinkimacowboy05:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
An image used in this article, File:PurpleHeart.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
An image used in this article, File:Tito's Ribbons.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
(For anyone who is interested): I'd never heard of the term "ribbon bar" until very recently; I'd always heard of ribbons being referred to as "service ribbons" (I'm in the U.S., perhaps the other term is more common in the militaries of other countries?) This led me to do a google search for "service ribbon" and "ribbon bar", using quotes, whereupon I got the following results:
After flipping through numerous pages of the results for "service ribbon" and noting that the entries were discussing military ribbons, I observed that the first page of results and many thereafter for "ribbon bar" are not talking about military ribbons but instead other topics. Hence, I concluded the WP:COMMONNAME for these items is "service ribbon" and moved the article to that location. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 20:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found an old source (1921) discussing service ribbon's
These are simply short strips of the same design and width as the distincitve ribbon from which the medal itself is suspended and are known as service ribbons. The length of these service ribbons varies in different countries; the longest are the Portuguese, 7⁄8 inch, the shortest are the Russian, 7⁄32 inch. The British regulation length is 1⁄2 inch, the Italian 11⁄32 inch, the American 3⁄8 inch. In some countries there is no prescribed length. ... It should be understood that the "length" of a ribbon is the vertical dimension, the horizontal size is the "width." ... These service ribbons originated with the British about the time of the Crimean War. Lapel buttons are used with civilian clothes for the same purpose.
Are these regulation height's still correct? (I know the American is, exept for Army unit citations) If so I can add this source and thus we've also got a single sentence on history.
This is from: Wyllie, Col. Robert E. (1921). Orders, Decorations and Insignia: Military and Civil. New York and London: G.P. Putnam's Sons, the Knickerbocker Press. p. 29.
This has always bothered me that there is a group that insists on making all service ribbons to the same dimensions, whether they are correct or not. EricSerge (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I realize this is an old message, but I gotta ask: "why?" If they are all different sizes then they won't lineup properly and it looks like a kid cobbled together a Halloween costume rather than a sharp, professional uniform.
The only time it should even come up is with awarding's across countries (or cross branches in the one case of the US Army and unit awards). In all such cases the service member is not under the uniform regulations of the awarding entity, but rather their own country/branch.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
As before, I think service ribbon is more WP:COMMONNAME compared to ribbon bar. Granted, not all ribbons are necessarily from "service", but using the term ribbon bar has two unintended effects. First, it may be referring to the cloth ribbon itself, or it may be referring to the metal bars that the ribbons are affixed to, which are in turn pinned to a jacket or formal clothing. Secondly, if you Google search for ribbon bar, the term is simultaneously in common use for referring to the graphical control element in a lot of software today (for example, the "ribbon bar" at the top of Microsoft Word and other office programs). Conversely, if you Google search for service ribbon, all entries that come up are referring to the ribbons at issue. Also, historically, if you look at the preceding talk page section above, Gecko G's source from 1921 specifically refers to them as "service ribbons", which was almost a century ago. Just my two cents. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
MovetoMedal ribbon. I don't know if this is an ENGVAR issue, but to me (as a British person) service ribbons mean only the ribbons of service medals (i.e. medals awarded for service in a particular campaign to all who qualify). They do not include ribbons for honours, gallantry medals, commemorative medals, etc. "Medal ribbon", on the other hand, which is currently a redirect here, covers all of these and is a term that would be understood everywhere. It's certainly the common term in the UK and Commonwealth and it also appears to be commonly used in the United States. The "ribbon bar" is the whole assemblage of ribbons worn and does not refer to individual ribbons. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support first and redirect. This is possibly an ENGVAR issue (as I said above), but in the Commonwealth a service ribbon is awarded to anyone who meets certain criteria (e.g. serves in a certain campaign or for a certain number of years). A medal ribbon covers any ribbon worn the left breast of a uniform, including service ribbons as well as those for gallantry and meritorious service. It's a broader category. And that's what this article is concerned with. Given its international scope, it should be moved to the broader term which is understood everywhere (including the USA). Not sure about second. Should certainly be moved, but I'm not sure what to. Rosette (award), maybe, as that's primarily what it's about and for which it's certainly the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Am I misreading the text, or is there a contradiction in regards to the U.S. Navy? In regard to this branch, it reads:
In the U.S. Navy, they are worn in rows of three with no staggering or spacing between rows (with the exception of the top row, which may be staggered to the wearer's left if covered by a lapel).
But immediately following, it states:
For U.S. Navy members who have three or more ribbons, they can elect to wear only their three highest-ranked ones instead of all of them and if their top three ribbons are obscured by a lapel, they can stagger the top row.
So, does this mean that U.S. Navy members are allowed only one row of three ribbons with redundant wording, or they can wear multiple rows but each is limited to their top three ribbons for each row, or is one of the entries actually supposed to say U.S. Air Force? — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like I missed several years worth of discussions on here, but jumping in now. I see that bit is not even in the article anymore, but I'll answer just in case you are still curious-
In the US Navy, my understanding is that IF you have 4 or more ribbons in your "rack", then you have the option of either wearing ONLY the three highest precedence ribbons, or of wearing ALL of them. If the later, you may need to stagger the top row(s) if the lapel is in the way. The Navy is the only US branch that gives this option.
Hope that clarifies, and sorry for the late response.
