Contents

Talk:NASA spin-off technologies

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Invention Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Spaceflight High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance). Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

The result of the move request was: CONSENSUS TO NOT MOVE. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NASA spinoff technologies → List of NASA spin-off technologies – The article seems much more like a list than a typical article. Also, added a dash in "spin-off" per the typical dictionary spelling of the term. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose, the lede intro gives the history of the topic and then the items follow not as a list but as individual topics. A list would have shorter sections, even one sentence descriptors. Seems fine as is, and the "list" name could be a redirect. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, this is not a list class article. I did make the list page into a redirect. --Frmorrison (talk) 18:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

For those familiar with the editing milieu surrounding this Wikipedia article, the following source might be useful:

• Karlin, Susan (January 24, 2022). "How new NASA tech gets used on Earth—from sportswear to beer". Fast Company. Archived from the original on January 24, 2022.
• Wikitext for cite:

{{cite magazine |last1=Karlin |first1=Susan |title=How new NASA tech gets used on Earth—from sportswear to beer |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90714980/nasa-technologies-used-on-earth |magazine=Fast Company |date=January 24, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220124215148/https://www.fastcompany.com/90714980/nasa-technologies-used-on-earth |archive-date=January 24, 2022 | url-status=live }}

Cheers. —RCraig09 (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]