 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I've demoted the article to a stub, as many more information regarding the subject can be added, like its history. Also, the lists seem outdated, as new National Artists have just been proclaimed recently. -Jjmontalbo 13:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fernando Ocampo is not a National Artist. I took him out of the list 125.60.243.27 (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Until the issues regarding Carlo Caparas's appointment is resolved with finality, let us just stick to the official categories of National Artists as posted in the NCCA website, the reason being that the NCCA is the definitive authority with regard to matters regarding the NAs. I will revert any attempts to move it back unless there is either an official update from the NCCA or from an official (and clarificatory announcement) coming from the Office of the President or the Supreme Court (and, of course, supported by reliable and WP:verifiable sources. Thanks. --- Tito Pao (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I have added a "requires attention" tag to this page because I am uncertain how to fix the damage that anon vandals have done. Not all the anons have done bad edits, but some have changed information; I am not enough of an expert to be able to tell them apart. - Alternativity (talk) 09:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on National Artist of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Artist of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all. This is just to let everyone know that I've removed the "Disputed" tag that was on the top of the article, having done a cursory check of inaccuracies that may have been introduced since approximately December 2015. The article was tagged "needs attention" in August 2017 in light of "inaccuracies introduced by various anons", and that tag was upgraded to "article disputed" in May 2018. This is understandable, since this article is always the subject of vandalism attempts. However, crosschecking today's version with edits starting 2016 suggest that any introduced inaccuracies have been corrected, and that the article, while it could use additional work, does not contain any inaccuracies introduced by anons after 2016. (I'm sorry, I can't fact-check further than that.) I removed the Template, hoping this edit point can serve as a reasonable "last good edit point" against which any vandalism can be checked in the future. If I missed any inaccuracies, my apologies. Here's hoping we can keep this page clean from here on. - Alternativity (talk) 10:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I hope this was helpful information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.58.148.246 (talk) 04:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Non 2001:4455:2D1:6000:45E2:34D1:2F5C:25B3 (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
