Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Biography assessment rating comment  
3 comments  




2 Composer project review  
1 comment  




3 Assessment comment  
1 comment  













Talk:Nicola Vicentino




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

With a couple things like a picture or an infobox, this could be a B.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bio-infoboxes are discouraged for composers. Actually biography Project guidelines are more suited to pop musicians. --Kleinzach 08:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italy exist since 1861, and Vicenza was annexed to the Reign of Italy in 1866. The biography of a person should refer to its original nationality at the time s/he was in life, therefore Nicola Vicentino was a Venetian composer (its original nationality). Even the phrase "experimental secular music in Italy" is incorrect, since at that time it was called the italic peninsula. (For comparison see the Apacheans and even better see Navajo nation: they are not called US Americans.) I dropped these lines because I'm not familiar in editing wikipedia. (Hütte) 82.58.231.165 (talk) 22:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Composer project review[edit]

I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles. This article, in my opinion, only needs some clarification of the composer's works list to qualify for an A rating; see my detailed review on the comments page. Questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nicola Vicentino/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
==Composers Project Assessment of Nicola Vicentino: 2008-12-8==

This is an assessment of article Nicola Vicentino by a member of the Composers project, according to its assessment criteria. This review was done by Magicpiano.

If an article is well-cited, the reviewer is assuming that the article reflects reasonably current scholarship, and deficiencies in the historical record that are documented in a particular area will be appropriately scored. If insufficient inline citations are present, the reviewer will assume that deficiencies in that area may be cured, and that area may be scored down.

Adherence to overall Wikipedia standards (WP:MOS, WP:WIAGA, WP:WIAFA) are the reviewer's opinion, and are not a substitute for the Wikipedia's processes for awarding Good ArticleorFeatured Article status.

===Origins/family background/studies=== Does the article reflect what is known about the composer's background and childhood? If s/he received musical training as a child, who from, is the experience and nature of the early teachers' influences described?

  • ok

===Early career=== Does the article indicate when s/he started composing, discuss early style, success/failure? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed?

  • ok

===Mature career=== Does the article discuss his/her adult life and composition history? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed?

  • ok

===List(s) of works=== Are lists of the composer's works in WP, linked from this article? If there are special catalogs (e.g. Köchel for Mozart, Hoboken for Haydn), are they used? If the composer has written more than 20-30 works, any exhaustive listing should be placed in a separate article.

  • unclear if all works are mentioned.

===Critical appreciation=== Does the article discuss his/her style, reception by critics and the public (both during his/her life, and over time)?

  • Good

===Illustrations and sound clips=== Does the article contain images of its subject, birthplace, gravesite or other memorials, important residences, manuscript pages, museums, etc? Does it contain samples of the composer's work (as composer and/or performer, if appropriate)? (Note that since many 20th-century works are copyrighted, it may not be possible to acquire more than brief fair use samples of those works, but efforts should be made to do so.) If an article is of high enough quality, do its images and media comply with image use policy and non-free content policy? (Adherence to these is needed for Good Article or Featured Article consideration, and is apparently a common reason for nominations being quick-failed.)

  • Images present; no sound. This article (orarchicembalo) would benefit from sound samples demonstrating the differences in tuning being described.

===References, sources and bibliography=== Does the article contain a suitable number of references? Does it contain sufficient inline citations? (For an article to pass Good Article nomination, every paragraph possibly excepting those in the lead, and every direct quotation, should have at least one footnote.) If appropriate, does it include Further Reading or Bibliography beyond the cited references?

===Structure and compliance with WP:MOS=== Does the article comply with Wikipedia style and layout guidelines, especially WP:MOS, WP:LEAD, WP:LAYOUT, and possibly WP:SIZE? (Article length is not generally significant, although Featured Articles Candidates may be questioned for excessive length.)

  • ok; a GA reviewer might want a longer lead.

===Things that may be necessary to pass a Good Article review===

  • Article requires more inline citations (WP:CITE)

===Summary=== Interesting article about an important Renaissance figure. His life and interesting career are covered; it is unclear if the works listed (the two books of madrigals and motets) represent his known compositions.

The article has images, but no sound. Examples of the tuning differences would be illustrative (although whether they are better placed here or archicembalo or both, could be debated). There are no inline citations; not GA for an article this long. A GA reviewer may also want a longer lead.

Article is close to A-class; clarifying the content of the oeuvre being the main block. Magic♪piano 14:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 01:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nicola_Vicentino&oldid=1210611858"

Categories: 
B-Class biography articles
B-Class biography (musicians) articles
Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
Musicians work group articles
B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
Science and academia work group articles
WikiProject Biography articles
B-Class Composers articles
WikiProject Composers articles
Articles with conflicting quality ratings
C-Class Music theory articles
Unknown-importance Music theory articles
WikiProject Music theory articles
Hidden category: 
Noindexed pages
 



This page was last edited on 27 February 2024, at 13:24 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki