Operation Deliberate Force is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
title 1995 NATO bombing (or air) campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina[edit]
I'm sorry, but the current name is blatantly misleading. "Bombing Campaign" sounds like "strategic bombing." The events described in this article were anything but, and for that matter, didn't involve "bomber" type aircraft, but rather "attack" and "fighter" aircraft operating in two basic phases: fighter aircraft denying flight in a no fly-zone and then attack aircraft making directed attacks against specific military targets while being protected by fighter type aircraft. "1995 NATO Air Campaign in Bosnia" is most correct.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.12.110 (talk) 15 August 2012
This article should have encyclopedic title, which is the only one - Operation Deliberate Force. All other are just POV and OR. Also Operation Desert Storm, Operation Allied Force and some others - basing on exactly same principles like in the cases Operation Overlord, Operation BarbarossaorOperation Torch. Yes, I know Military history#CODENAME, but this rule is senseless and should be changed. --Matrek (talk) 04:18, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The timeline is:
16:23, 14 March 2009 GTBacchus (talk·contribs) m . . (4,962 bytes) (0) . . (moved 1995 NATO bombing of Bosnia and Herzegovina to 1995 NATO bombing campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina: per move request; see talk page for discussion)
06:37, 16 August 2012 Peacemaker67 (talk·contribs) m . . (23,308 bytes) (0) . . (Peacemaker67 moved page 1995 NATO bombing campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina to 1995 NATO air campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina: see talk)
25 January 2013 XXzoonamiXX (talk·contribs) m . . (15,108 bytes) (0) . . (XXzoonamiXX moved page 1995 NATO air campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina to 1995 NATO bombing campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina over redirect: Since NATO began bombing Bosnia, it should be renamed that way it was before. It wasn't like they cou...)
I don't see the full explanation of the last move for some reason, so I'm reverting this now until that is provided. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Actually, there isn't much more old consensus about the old title, either. Let's go with the newest suggestion. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with this move. MILMOS should be followed where possible, and the air campaign version was a descriptive title intended to avoid the one-sided operation name and to accommodate the no-fly zone aspects as well. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 23:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that it's ambiguous - the other NATO operation was also an air campaign and it also involved bombing targets in BiH in 1995. There's also a cover article NATO intervention in Bosnia that would be the best target for these ambiguous redirects. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I don't quite see the one-sidedness problem with the operation name. Can you please explain? I saw one such comment in talk from 2006, but it was contested and wasn't explained, either. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I lost interest. The general rule in MILHIST is that we tend to try to avoid operation names as they reflect only one side of the equation, so are inherently not neutral. Personally I think the rule is honoured mostly in the breach, and there are occasions ehere the operation name better defines the topic. So disregard my objection, I withdraw. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any proof or citation in regard of the popular pressure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.154.146.222 (talk) 21:29, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Deliberate Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on Operation Deliberate Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
