Contents

Talk:Parking chair

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Pittsburgh Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Vago, Mike (December 7, 2020). "Here are a few of Wikipedia's most surprisingly controversial topics". The A.V. Club.

I have moved this page to Parking chairs, because this phenomenon goes beyond reserving parking spaces during snowstorms. --Blargh29 (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with with this change. It is a simpler title. I just moved it to parking chair just to have it as a singular tense, and I made some other changes, so the paragraphs flow better into one another. Sebwite (talk) 07:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The criticism section reeks of original research. For example, where is the verifiable evidence stating that people observe "parking chair" norms due to a fear of physical reprisal against themself or their property rather than courtesy? Much of the section makes the tradition out to be ugly, uncivilized, and barbaric. I'm very tempted to blank everything but the objective point regarding the efficiency of space allocation. —Bill Price (nyb) 01:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's terrible. I want to delete that whole section. 196.215.78.94 (talk) 12:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should. The entire thing reads like it was written by someone who had his mirror knocked off for parking in a claimed spot. Bellfazar (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I did not grow up in Chicago but lived there from 1988-2003. Having lived in a high-rise my first 5 years there, when I first encountered parking chairs after our first snow storm in a 3 flat on the near west side, I thought it was remarkably tacky/low brow/uncivilized. I later realized that if you grow up with this concept of "I dug it out so it is mine" mindset, it doesn't seem weird. (Compare to those who grew up with "Miracle Whip" and don't like real mayonnaise.) But, for those who've never encountered it, the idea that you get to keep a dug-out spot AFTER your car has departed is really childish. Or, at least, it seems to be to most of those I've told about this who didn't also grow up in places this was considered normal. (And, yes, this IS original research but at least its on a talk page. Oh, wait... I'm talking about the topic not its editing, etc. Sorry!) :-) dhugot (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.129.204.114 (talk) [reply]

I was randomly linked here, and astonished to find so many words on this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.138.42.36 (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is actually quite a lot written about this from a large number of sources, plenty enough to make it notable. It is a practice that dates back decades. It goes on in the city where I live, among many others, leading me to research it and ultimately write an article. It may sound astonishing to you, but people have gone deeply into this. Sebwite (talk) 02:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If someone is willing to do the research. This specific resource could possibly benefit from additional information expanding on retribution. Notable incidences as a result of retribution has garnered short-lived media attention. With just enough passage of time in between, long enough to be forgotten until a more recent day incident once again reminds society retributions in past have most always reached serious level of a felony crime.

Including vandalism, serious physical harm and murder. CHICAGOCONCERTMAN (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone put a tag at the top of this page, claiming this article was not written at a worldwide perspective. At the time I wrote this article (my part that is, since others have added to it since), I found sources describing it in quite a lot of northeastern US cities, but almost nothing anywhere else. I actually looked quite hard to see if people did it elsewhere in the world, such as in Canada, Europe, and other snowy places, and there was nothing. I was really surprised. In fact, I only found one source describing it in a place outside the Washington-Boston corridor, and that was in Kansas City, and it was too trivial to use in this article. I guess it is not that widespread elsewhere. Sebwite (talk) 02:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't have to occur in snowy places. People could place chairs to mark parking spaces they actually own (on their property), or they could just do it to mark spots if there are too many people and too few spots. This could be done in other places such as India or China, not just in snowy places or "Western" countries. So there you go: systematic bias. 68.105.192.216 (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This practice is most likely in areas of high population density, where a parking shortage exists (too many cars/too little land), and during events which reduce parking over a wide area. This reduces the parts of the world where this activity is necessary. It won't happen everywhere. -- SEWilco (talk) 20:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded to flickr and appropriately licensed some photos that might be appropriate for this page. Please feel free to grab, edit, and include them here (or elsewhere) with attribution. Szarka (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Parking chair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/02/saving_spaces_e_1.html?

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Parking chair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/02/saving_spaces_e_1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100212045643/http://www.wpxi.com/news/22503635/detail.htmltohttp://www.wpxi.com/news/22503635/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]