This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This User:Dahn is stalking me, and probably other editors as well. All my changes are reverted by him on frivolous charges, including when the talk pages demonstrates his defending of absurd POV. Icar12:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I tried to avoid pages where you conflict. The last edit was not yours or Dahn's. Now I see you were fighting here.
My remark: you (Icar) should add in your version of the lead the part with "PG was a Romanian politician". You should also mark his leading functions between the 2 WW. For instance, he was minister for Transylvania just after WWI. I'll try a change, see if you like it. Dpotop12:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It looks much better now. I still see a small problem, with the fact that he headed several governments, from the Communist-dominated one of March 6, 1945 to the outright communist ones after 1946. Maybe adding governmentS would be appropriate.
Btw, I am not "fighting", only trying to remove some revolting propaganda from the 1950's that I thought would never be seriously defended again. Icar12:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dahn, do you have a decent reason for changing systematically "Prime minister" into "Premier"? AFAIK, in Romania and in most countries the two words are perfect synonyms. Dpotop13:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I did not "change" it. I changed the second mention of it, because, unlike others, i actually care about how redundant a text is. Just as I care about capitalization, links, grammar, and relevancy. Dahn13:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, on Valter Roman you didn't seem to care about redundancy in the listing of communist parties the guy belonged to. You seem suddenly interested here in style (as opposed to coherency, on Valter Roman)? Dpotop14:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As usual. The self-justified Dahn ignores whatever other users say, when he wants it. Insulting, I'd say. Dpotop14:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe I should add: if you and your friends have any other assumptions to make about my character, I reserve the right to ignore them. Dahn14:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Friends? You mean, like you and Khoikhoi (who's reverting for you even when he doesn't have a clue)? No, I don't have such a thing on Wikipedia. Dpotop18:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Petru Groza's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡21:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article bears a strong bias against Groza, it makes it sound as if he was the main catalyst in the post-war years. He had no choice, after the Treaty of Yalta Romania fell to the USSR, he tried to ease the transition as best he could, but there is no alternate history, as the article seems to suggest where Romania could have been spared that blight had he acted differently. He did the best he could with what he had, and managed to reclaim Transylvania from the magyars, but he had limited autonomy, and had to report to Moscow. (80.33.152.186 (talk) 10:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]
I have just modified 4 external links on Petru Groza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. Charles Sudetic (July 1989). "Postwar Romania, 1944-85". In Bachman, Ronald D (ed.). Romania: a country study. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. LCCN 90006449.
