Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Nanoporous Materials  
2 comments  




2 References  
2 comments  




3 See also  
1 comment  




4 Measuring Porosity  
1 comment  




5 Porality?  
2 comments  




6 Optical methods for determining porosity  
5 comments  













Talk:Porosity




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Nanoporous Materials

[edit]

Where is the section on nanoporous materials (zeolites, activated carbon and so on)??? Its a shocking absence! 130.195.86.38 10:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Spikeyi[reply]

I agree that these should be mentioned. Also, the nanopores in volcanic ash have some implications for the ways in which porosity in sediments is measured and how quickly these sediments are altered. Unfortunately, I don't have any free and open sources from which to write this section at the moment. It's on my to-do list unless someone else does it first.Elriana (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Addition of 4 references and formatting of 6 references.


Glasbey, C.A. (1991). "Image analysis and three-dimensional modelling of pores in soil aggregates". Journal of Soil Science. 42: 479–486. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

Horgan, G.W. (1994). "Simulating diffusion in a Boolean model of soil pores". European Journal of Soil Science. 45: 483–491. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

Horgan, Graham W. (October 1, 1996). "A review of soil pore models" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |accessed= ignored (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)accessed on 2006-04-16

Horgan, G.W. (1998). "Mathematical morphology for soil image analysis". European Journal of Soil Science. 49: 161–174.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)

Horgan, G.W. (1999). "An investigation of the geometric influences on pore space diffusion". Geoderma. 88: 55–71.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)

Nelson, J. Roy (January 2000). "Physics of impregnation". Microscopy Today (issue #00-1). {{cite journal}}: |issue= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)


Shinkolobwe 18:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This selection of references is a bit odd. Such a general topic needs references in form of monographs. Sheidegger comes to mind, among others. Is there anything in particular about Hogan's work that stands out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BorisG (talkcontribs) 14:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]

Effective porosity under construction.


Shinkolobwe 18:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Measuring Porosity

[edit]

This section needs attention. It is written as a basic how to manual. Suggest leaving only types of methods and removing explanations. I will leave as is for now, but will return later to amend. Halogenated (talk) 03:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Also removed irrelevant info on porosity in manufacturing.

Porality?

[edit]

I have not heard of porality before, and it did not reveal any good google matches either. It might be a WP:NEOLOGISM, in any case, unless it can be sufficiently referenced, it has to be removed. --Berland (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No comments here, so I am removing the paragraph. --Berland (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Optical methods for determining porosity

[edit]

Optical methods (e.g., determining the area of the material versus the area of the pores visible under the microscope)

In this case, is the porosity measured on the section equal to the porosity of the volume , or do the different spacial dimensions have to be accounted for by raising to the power 1.5.

That is, is

or is

As in the article, are the total and the pore volume, respectively. Accordingly, are the total cross section area and the cross section area of the pores. TomeasyTC 07:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you note, the symbols in the equation for the gas expansion method may need to be changed (to bring in in line with the rest of the article).
The areal and volumetric porosities are equal, I (hopefully) clarified this in the article--sorry I have missed it. Stan J. Klimas (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your quick response.
I did not mean to comment on the notation used in the article. I simply tried to use a notation similar to the first equation in the article. If this triggered some improvement pertaining to the gas expansion method, I am happy.
My only concern was the optical method. You made the statement very clear now. However, are you sure that this is correct? Or how can you justify this? At least we must assume that the cross section is representative for all possible cross sections, I think. Under this assumption, I think you are right, but I also have doubts. I'll try to explain my doubting reasoning.
Think of two discs with surface areas A1 and A2 = 0.01*A1, where A1 is the surface area of a cut through a sphere and A2 is the surface area of a pore in the sphere. In this case, the corresponding volumes are related by V2 = 0.01^1.5*V1.
I guess there is something wrong in this line of thought, but I am lacking a clear cut reasoning why things are as simple as the article says after your correction. TomeasyTC 19:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To the statement in the article, I added a reference (Dullien) that summarizes the solution (page 7) as follows:

The porosity of a sample is equal to the "areal porosity" provided that the pore structure is "random".

The issue of interdependence of volumetric, areal, and linear porosities is discussed in more detail here. Hope this helps! Best regards, Stan J. Klimas (talk) 14:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for helping me and improving the article. TomeasyTC 19:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Porosity&oldid=1194887426"

Categories: 
Start-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
Start-Class level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
Start-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
Start-Class Geology articles
High-importance Geology articles
High-importance Start-Class Geology articles
WikiProject Geology articles
Start-Class Metalworking articles
Mid-importance Metalworking articles
Start-Class Soil articles
Mid-importance Soil articles
WikiProject Soil articles
Hidden category: 
All soil articles
 



This page was last edited on 11 January 2024, at 07:13 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki