 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Postpartum bleeding.
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 July 2019 and 23 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexuang, Dannymrowr, Brendado425, Mparagas18. Peer reviewers: Pkhouder, Kmhudson22.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The ISTH Scientific Standardisation Commmittee (SSC) has issued a guideline on the management of coagulopathy in PPH. doi:10.1111/jth.13174 JFW | T@lk 11:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Expand on signs and symptoms of bleeding to cover more serious signs and symptoms, including circulatory shock and potential encephalopathy. --Dannymrowr (talk) 20:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Part 1
1.Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “guiding framework”? The group's edit provided information that allowed the readers what to look out for (signs and symptoms) when dealing with postpartum bleeding Kylett1 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Yes, the group’s edits have substantially improved the article. The addition of postpartum hemorrhage in signs and symptoms, as well as expanding on general signs and symptoms have improved the article content.Pkhouder (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
yes the groups edits have improved the article, they have expanded the knowledge on the sign and symptoms. Kmhudson22 (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
2. Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement? Yes, the group has achieved its overall goal for improvement, specifically expanding on shock, one of the possible sign due to severe bleeding Kylett1 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Yes, the group has achieved their proposed goals for improvement by expanding on signs and symptoms.Pkhouder (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
yes the group has met the goals they set out to achieve for improvement. Kmhudson22 (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Part 2:
A. yes the edits do reflect a neutral point of view Kmhudson22 (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC) B. yes Kylett1 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC) C. yes[reply]
