Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 "New messages" joke  
6 comments  




2 Purim  
1 comment  




3 Germany  
1 comment  




4 Image  
3 comments  




5 Unreferenced Tag  
1 comment  




6 New external link  
2 comments  




7 Book title  
2 comments  




8 Well known practical jokers  
4 comments  




9 Movies / fraternities  
1 comment  




10 Moving unencyclopedic section here  
3 comments  


10.1  Types of practical jokes  







11 Origin  
1 comment  




12 Derivation?  
1 comment  




13 Piltdown Man  
3 comments  




14 Canadian engineers  
1 comment  




15 Cartoon Character  
1 comment  




16 Antics and Pranks are the same.  
1 comment  




17 Definition  
1 comment  




18 If Jokes are our weakness/weak spot? What risks?  
2 comments  




19 infobox  
2 comments  




20 Sir Montgomery Cecil  
2 comments  




21 Proposed merge of Student prank into Practical joke  
2 comments  




22 Cars under bridges  
2 comments  




23 Authority control  
2 comments  




24 Balance of the jest  
1 comment  




25 panrk  
1 comment  




26 Prank  
1 comment  




27 Did you know nomination  
3 comments  













Talk:Practical joke




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


"New messages" joke

[edit]

Re[1], this was intended as a good example of a practical joke for wikipedians. whats wrong with it being there?Nerd42 (talk) 03:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing at all! Does anybody know of any more Wikipedia practical jokes like the one above? Filmcom 03:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The 'new messages' should be linked to Special:Mytalk, so when the person clicks the link it does link to their user talk page, so they will expect a new message even more. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I made it into a template called Practical Joke. I can be found on the top of this page and my Userpage. The Republican 21:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
which seems to have broken or been deleted. It really shouldn't be a template anyway. Reverted.  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 05:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The talk page is for improving the article being discussed, and is not meant to be part of any jokes or pranks we may engage in with each other as editors. All of that type of content should be strictly avoided on article talk pages, let alone articles themselves. We should not place this fake message template so that it directs editors to this page.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Purim

[edit]

Is the Jewish holiday Priam? related here? (bad spelling, placemarker) 30 August 2004 DennisDaniels

Do you mean Purim? It sounds plausible that practical jokes could be a part of that celebration since it does have a strong element of carnival and mischievous merriment. I'll look it up, and if that is the case I'll add it to the article. Jonas Liljeström 16:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Germany

[edit]

"Practical jokes are features of various kinds of holidays, such as April Fool's Day, Halloween, the Day of the Holy Innocents (in Spanish-speaking cultures), and the night before May Day in Germany."

As a German, I can safely say that I have never heard of pranks being done the night before May Day. There's the April Fool's Day in Germany as well, except that Germans call it "1. April" and whenever they've successfully managed to trick someone, they cry "April, April!".17:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC) Judith
Same here. There's no such thing being celebrated on April 30 / May 1 in Germany. April Fool's Day is traditional, Halloween has also become a favourite kid's event over the past few years and there's still Rummelpott on December 31 where kids make some noise in order to get some sweets (similar to Halloween). Therefore I delete this part. 07:05, 17 February 2006 (CET) Sven
Judith and Sven, thats not true in large parts of Germany in the night before May 1 the Maibaum is stolen by neighbouring villages and lovelines are drawn between love interests.--Tresckow 09:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

I hate this image, File:Joke - phone books in doorway.jpg. It doesn't really resemble a practical joke. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 04:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good picture for the article, especially since it is difficult to illustrate most other types of practical jokes, involving some type of action or deception that can't be captured in a still photograph. I think the picture of the phone books is amusing and relevant to the topic. OneVeryBadMan 08:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
that image is hillarious. I'm gonna do that one day!8 September 2006 201.252.156.138
I agree with the first person. I'm going to remove popular Shakam 05:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced Tag

[edit]

I am of the opinion that the following template:

is not needed in this article because the subject itself isn't one that would normally be written about, much less be cited. Whoever disagrees, respond here, or else I'll remove it. Kareeser|Talk! 06:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's most important policies. -- Jeandré, 2006-12-10t08:01z
[edit]

Hello, I recently discovered a new website that contains extremely funny pranks to pull on other people. These pranks however are for your computer such as sending them through e-mail. The web site is http://www.lizardworks.com/pranks.html[dead link] and I'm not sure if this should be added to the page. Any comments on wether it should or shouldn't be added?Azizza 23:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While its shareware, and free, its still a "commercial" site, and not a neutral source. Such sites abound, and this one probably doesnt qualify for inclusion. However, if it ever gets its own article, a "See also" link would suffice.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Book title

[edit]

The correct title of the H. Allen Smith referred to is indeed THE COMPLEAT PRACTICAL JOKER. Mr. Smith used the archaic spelling of COMPLEAT, NOT the modern COMPLETE. The reason I know is that I own this book. 71.214.94.108 21:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed & changed in the article. -SCEhardT 22:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well known practical jokers

[edit]

Should Ashton Kutcher be added to the list? Just a thought. JordanZed 22:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about Jim Carrey? He's a practical joker, I suppose! - Iris virus —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.97.0.238 (talk) 08:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This well known stuff is easily vandalized. Considering that this article has more vandalizations than contributions and the amount of wonder involved to consider if the person or thing has anything to do with this article I think it would be best to minimize the lists. There are dead wrestlers, rock stars and other people that I have no idea what to think about them. I think the article is broad enough to give the reader a gist without the lists. Blackwidowhex (talk) 03:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree David Spector (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Movies / fraternities

[edit]

Isn't there a connection between pranks and college fraternities, or, at least, with a certain type of movie featuring fraternities and their pranks? The article doesn't reflect this at this point. -- 790 08:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving unencyclopedic section here

[edit]

Types of practical jokes

[edit]

(hidden text) PLEASE READ BEFORE ADDING A JOKE: This section is intended to cover types (or categories) of jokes, not specific jokes. A list of all possible jokes would be impossibly long. (end hidden text)

Most of the content above has no place in an encyclopedia. If you think there's something salvageable in the section, then please by all means restore four or five, encyclopedic examples or types or whatever they're supposed to be of practical jokes. But not the whole list. Please. - (), 16:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are completely wrong. This should go back to the article, because it lacks examples. Damn deletionists like you should be removed from wikipedia, because you simply destroy the articles by your useless behaviour 89.77.118.185 (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While the entire section was unsourced, it did have links to articles on well known types of pranks. A simple list of links to notable pranks is fine, though each one, strictly speaking, should also have a reference HERE showing notability, as well as being linked to the article. the sentences describing them here can be very brief, as the article will describe in more detail. I know im writing this 4 years later, but in all instances, its appropriate to remind people to be civil. Both points of view presented above have some validity.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Origin

[edit]

Could someone cite the origins of the pranks or possibly the origins of the names of the pranks? (E.G. Atomic Sit Up) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.248.253 (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Derivation?

[edit]

Why is it called a practical joke? And when was the term first used? Kingturtle (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piltdown Man

[edit]

I was trying to place a serious study result on the main page regarding this. This is now well tabulated. However, as my entry was deleted, I see no further reason to pursue it.MacOfJesus (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even the entry I made in "see also" section on the main page to; "Piltdown Man" was deleted, whereas in anyone's understanding a link would be appropriate.MacOfJesus (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This was a hoax, not a practical joke, though the 2 are similar.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian engineers

[edit]

As I'm sure all Canadians know engineers are very widely known for their pranking. I've added a little info (mostly from the UBC engineers wikipedia page but edited - it's not cut and paste), I'm sure there are more cases and also noticed the footnotes didn't transfer (I don't know how to do this). This has been going on for decades, particularly the hanging of volkswagen beetles from bridges, sticking on top of buidings, etc. Also the abduction of a life sized metal cow, it goes on and on. Trophies have been stolen, in Ontario I know there are all sorts of crazy things too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.218.83 (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Character

[edit]

There's a cartoon character I've been trying to remember that was known as a practical joker around his neighborhood (and no, it's not Dennis the Menace, although he does remind me of him). I believe it was a white boy who had a black boy friend. I think this cartoon was from the 80s. It might have been a spin or rip off of Dennis the Menace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeremeK (talkcontribs) 14:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Antics and Pranks are the same.

[edit]

Antics should also be included as another name for pranksAlbesanti123 (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Albesantii123[reply]

Definition

[edit]

At the start of the article, the word "joke" is used in the definition of "Practical Joke." You shouldn't use [one of the] words that you're defining in the definition. The author has enough synonyms in the definition that (s)he can remove the word "joke." 72.25.48.239 (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If Jokes are our weakness/weak spot? What risks?

[edit]

Can a discipline repel jokes. If anyone gives jokes to us, should they be given disciplinary action? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.209.81.37 (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that disciples should repel jokes. That is their discipline, action or not. Their weak spot rappels too quickly; that is their risk, what? David Spector (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

infobox

[edit]

does this article need an infobox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.250.127 (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Infoboxes are not required for an article, and I can't think which one would be appropriate here anyway: Wikipedia:List of infoboxes. Chaheel Riens (talk) 13:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Montgomery Cecil

[edit]

Why does the entry "Sir Montgomery Cecil" redirect here? 194.136.115.86 (talk) 08:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Said entry was deleted a couple months after the above post. For the reason why, as well as why the article redirected here in the first place, see this discussion.--Martin IIIa (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Student prank into Practical joke

[edit]

Both of these articles are very undeveloped; they need further expansion before they'll be ready to split. I'm also not convinced there's anything so fundamentally different about pranks done by students as opposed to those from non-students that require separating the pages; student pranks can just be a section of the main article. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cars under bridges

[edit]

The Durham prank preceded the BC pranks by many years and may have been an inspiration for them. Also there is a picture if you follow the link, but I'm not sure of copyright status so can't load it. Perhaps you'll think again? Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We currently have UBC and Cambridge as examples of car pranks. If you think Durham has the more notable car prank, then feel free to use it instead, but it has to be because it's the more notable prank rather than just because of any ties you might have to Durham, and we'd want to swap out one of the other examples since three is too many. WP:EXAMPLECRUFT is a huge risk for this page. (Also, while you're here, your input at the merge proposal for this and Student prank would be appreciated if you're inclined.) {{u|Sdkb}}talk 17:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Authority control

[edit]

@Tom.Reding: I'm not overly familiar with the rules about when to add authority control, but this isn't the sort of article I'd normally expect to see it at; are you sure it's justified? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 16:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb: for anyone wanting to lookup works related to (in this case) practical jokes in the various institutions listed, I think it is useful. Feel free to revert, of course.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  18:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balance of the jest

[edit]

Fundamentally, all comedy relies on contrast, and the practical joke falls under the oldest form, slapstick, in that the audience finds the comedy in the thought, "Thank heavens that didn't happen to me!" However, it does rely on the goodwill of the subject, and when that's missing, for whatever reason, it becomes bullying. Simply apologising does not suffice for the psychological harm done: I therefore urge you to add a caveat critique along these lines because at the moment, it's lacking NPOV. I won't do that myself because I'm neurodiverse and have been the subject of this far too often: my neutrality can be questioned.

Do you know of any newspapers, books, or other reliable sources that talk about this? If so, we could definitely add it to the article, but we need references to support it, as otherwise it's original research. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 18:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

panrk

[edit]

Hhu 113.211.139.128 (talk) 02:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prank

[edit]

[2]https://youtube.com/shorts/OzDx6tWO7Rk?feature=share Andaz8 (talk) 20:50, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 03:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

)

Created by Waylon111 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be loggedatTemplate talk:Did you know nominations/Practical joke; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Practical_joke&oldid=1209849233"

Categories: 
Start-Class sociology articles
Mid-importance sociology articles
Start-Class Comedy articles
Top-importance Comedy articles
WikiProject Comedy articles
 



This page was last edited on 23 February 2024, at 21:07 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki