This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2022 and 26 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lovedong (article contribs).
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Synchronicity333.
"Robotics de facto unifies the so called two cultures, science and humanities..."
I don't see how... explain your reasons to state that please.
guessing that you wanted to say that "Roboethics unify..." instead of "Robotics unify..."?
How does this article get away with not mentioning Isaac Asimov's Three Laws which is the cornerstone of the entire subject of Roboethics? All work in this field is the result of discussion, criticism, modification or improvement (and even rejection) of Asimov's original ideas. Its like an article about gravity not mentioning Newton! Roger (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Asimov's laws are mostly about the ethical duties a robot has toward a human. That is the subject of 'machine ethics'. Roboethics is about the duties man has toward the robot. That was NOT the subject of Asimov's three laws except at the meta level (should we program the robot with the three laws?). The update to this article as confused this issue.
[1]Gorbag42 (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article has a large collection of external links relative to its length, and I think some of them are only tangentially relevant. I like the organizations, but I think they belong in other articles. In particular, I'd propose to remove at least these: The Centre for Responsible Nanotechnology, Union of Concerned Scientists, The International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Humanity+. Does anyone have objections? Brian Tomasik (talk) 07:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think Ex Machina(2015) from Alex Garland should be mentioned. It approaches the subject of this paper: Extending Legal Protection to Social Robots: The Effects of Anthropomorphism, Empathy, and Violent Behavior Towards Robotic Objects -Author: Kate Darling [1]Eliezer.souzareis (talk) 06:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In reality, the terms roboethics and robot ethics have meant specifically different things. That is reflected in the intentions of the two groups with those names on FB. Roboethics has a closer relationship with philosophy and social science, among other things. It even reaches on that basis into public policy. Robot ethics is a term that's referred to the technical challenge of building ai ethics machines.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 May 2023 and 10 August 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): York1210 (article contribs).
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2022 and 26 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lovedong (article contribs).
