This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The "empty weight" figures are wrong (14500lb != 4420kg) but I don't know which figure (if either) is correct. 195.195.244.154 12:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Does anybody know of missing info from this article? The new MH-60T upgrade is mentioned. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldnt be a MH-60J (HH-60j modified) in variants ? --Jor70 (talk) 13:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, the HH-60Js are modified and redesignated MH-60T. This is mentioned in the article and in Coast Guard references (ref. 5, 6). -Fnlayson (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The MH-60T is just the much recent upgrade. You can find USCG MH-60J mentioned in lots of DoD pages [1][2][3][4] etc --Jor70 (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't seen that in my H-60 books. Possible mistake/typo?? The M modifier is generally for special operations versions per the Tri-service designation system. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but if was also used by the USCG since the MH-68 and with the MH-65C/D which replaced them. Also is highly strange many diff DoD organisations made the same typo. This even seems to be an operational manual [5] , although it is also bit confuse about distinguish between USN/USCG --Jor70 (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No idea. Maybe there was a MH-60 to HH-60 switch or vice versa at some point. I'll do some digging of my own... -Fnlayson (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
