This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Hi! Feel free to add to/edit the entry for St. Asaph, give our city a proud place in the Wikipedia!
There seems to be a contradiction between this article and the article A55 road - this article claims locals are still campaigning for a bypass, the A55 road article says it bypasses St Asaph!--213.162.108.112 19:46, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The intro seems to contradict itself - it calls St Asaph a city in the first line, then a town in the second line.
I always thought it was a city. Can anyone confirm? Kingbumpkin (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, but the contradiction still exists. If St Asaph is officially a town then the first paragraph should be changed to reflect this. I will edit if there are no objections.
Kingbumpkin (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
St Asaph seems to be a town and a city, at the same time. It had city status in 1911, and (as far as I know) the locals
never agreed to a change of any kind. In nearby counties, it is universally known as a city.
If there is some kind of office, that lists cities, we should ask it how this dual status came to be, and update
the article in accordance. I'll have a sniff about and try to find out about this, else it'll be classified as a "city-town",
to reflect the reality of the situation. 87.115.136.154 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In general, every city is also a town. More precisely, city status bestowed on an area does not deprive that area of any other status. A city as exceptionally small as St David's, for example, might perhaps even be seen as a village, just as St Asaph is both a small town and an exceptionally small city. Township is not generally an official status, so there is no official list, and people may have different views as to whether a place is a large village or a small town. On the other hand, city status is established by royal charter or (formerly) by being home to a cathedral. So for example the two towns of Brighton and of Hove together comprise the administrative county, district and (latterly) city of Brighton and Hove. See City status in the United Kingdom for more info. Richardguk (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments on towns and villages, which seem right. St Asaph is certainly a town, and (as there is no disputing that St Asaph is home to a cathedral) it is a city as well. I'm not aware of any way for a place that was once a city to become a non-city (e.g. even Machu Piccu is still called a city). Also, it has been known as a city since "since time immemorial" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City#United_Kingdom_and_Ireland). It is thus a city on at least two counts. As there seem to be no particular priorities between the necessary criteria (time immemorial, royal charter or cathedral) then any is sufficient to quality St Asaph as a city. Should the article be updated? 138.253.48.80 (talk) 09:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See Rochester and Perth. Technically, the only British place with time-immemorial city status is the City of London; all others have had their city status reconferred when local government changes abolished their original council. St. Asaph is categorically not a city. Wereon (talk) 02:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on St Asaph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
