This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Agree that this identification is incorrect. There are some other images in Commons that show leaves that don't fit as clearly into laurel-shaped or angular categories. It's difficult because apparently both species vary a lot in characteristics such as flower colour and hairiness. I've found only informal suggestions that the two species hybridize, and didn't find any statements in botanical sources that they should be considered to be a single species. This paper says that T. coccinea and T. grandiflora are more closely related to each other than to T. laurifolia, thus supporting keeping them as separate species: Borg, A.J.; McDade, L.A. (2008). "Molecular phylogenetics and morphological evolution of Thunbergioideae (Acanthaceae)". Taxon. 57 (3): 811–822.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Sminthopsis84 (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]