Contents

Talk:Tilford

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Surrey Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I see that there has been a debate as to whether Charleshill should be included in the Tilford page. There is coverage under Elstead, but from what I can see from the 1 to 25000 OS map, the majority of the area and buildings are within Tilford. The Pub is within Tilford. I will try to sign this, but my user name is changing. 86.172.117.74 (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be a disambiguation page. Rhodococcus directs here with Tilford being the name of a scientist. Bob the Wikipedian, the Tree of Life WikiDragon (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. This actually would be the sole official sense: see WP:Disambiguation. Western-influenced (and many eastern) people have two names (or more). - Adam37 Talk 12:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to remember some big celebrity names playing cricket at Tilford for charity many years ago (they may still do, I don't know). Is it worth a mention in this article? I don't have any details. Tony Holkham (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many Sports Clubs have charity matches which include people promoted as celebrity names. To my mind this is not a reason for inclusion in a page which is distinguishing one small place in the world from others. Nothing exceptional as regards Tilford.. SovalValtos (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence "The two villages by the triangular village green here are Scheduled Ancient Monuments[6]" seems to be nonsense. SovalValtos (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Sorted. Tony Holkham (talk) 23:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The entry seems to lie outside the village and hence should be moved elsewhere SovalValtos (talk) 21:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tilford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080826210534/http://www.visithaslemere.com/outandabout.htmltohttp://www.visithaslemere.com/outandabout.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]