This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Same-sex marriage in Oregon#Dispute over same-sex marriages in Oregon|Multnomah County]] The anchor (#Dispute over same-sex marriages in Oregon) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Recognition of same-sex unions in New Mexico#Sandoval County marriages, 2004|Sandoval County]] The anchor (#Sandoval County marriages, 2004) has been deleted.
[[Recognition of same-sex unions in New Mexico#Doña Ana County, 2013|Doña Ana County]] The anchor (#Doña Ana County, 2013) has been deleted.
[[Recognition of same-sex unions in New Mexico#Santa Fe, 2013|Santa Fe County]] The anchor (#Santa Fe, 2013) has been deleted.
[[Same-sex marriage in Ohio#Henry v. Himes|Henry v. Himes]] The anchor (Henry v. Himes) has been deleted.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
I've included nothing about these in the timeline, since I'm uncertain and don't have a specific date in any of these instances. Not a priority. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 15:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Added a citation for Maryland with an explanation. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Two men from Phoenix, Arizona obtain a marriage license, which the Arizona Supreme Court later invalidates.
It's mentioned in a number of places, but not footnoted. It's oddly specific (Jan 7) but vague as to when the court acted. The case name is unmentioned, but the fact that the court cited the Bible is. Urban legend or real? I'd just like to find a better source.
Rachel Kranz, Tim Cusick, Gay Rights (2005) "In 1975, a county clerk granted two men in Phoenix, Arizona a marriage license, but the Arizona Supreme Court,...citing the Bible, invalidated the marriage, and the state legislature passed a bill specifically prohibiting gay marriage." No citations. Not sure about that bill either. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Purple shading indicates a same-sex marriage federal court victory since December 2013.
The problem with this statement is the court outcomes have not been decided yet. The states shaded also are broad in nature, Tennessee for example was decided by a district judge not a federal one, Kentucky has in court that involves out of state marriages. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And a map on a timeline makes no sense in any case. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The person reverted said something about how the map could be "updated" but the word "victory" is pretty loaded. Seeing we already have the states striped yellow for these pending court cases (Tennessee, Illinois, and Indiana not being there) I do not see how this map could be useful on either article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The caption is poor. The start date is arbitrary. It extracts one type of info (federal district court "wins") from the timeline and privileges it. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 23:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of entries have nothing to do with marriage[edit]
The first entries, related to the US post office holding distribution of gay magazines, have a lot to do with homosexuality and its acceptedness by the united states government(s), but nothing with marriage. I'm removing them as unrelated (or rather not related enough). Gouvernathor (talk) 04:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it wasn't a lot, it seems relevent content is more substantial down on. Gouvernathor (talk) 04:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]