This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Treaty of Kars is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles
Indeed, some research is needed in support of the claims. For example, such entity as Armenian oblast did not exist in the region as an administrative unit. The area in question was parts of Kars, Erivan and Tiflis governorates of Russian Empire. So I made corrections in this regard. 11:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atabek (talk • contribs)
i deleted this part because the given reference is ridiculous. some forum of armenians in russian language discussing Armenian Genocide. please, present more verifiable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.162.152.28 (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the validity question in the article on 25 January 2010. This is in accordance to the fact, that the treaty was signed by unauthorised representatives of the countries and territories in question, as described. The issue is long known in all the countries and the international scene.
I also added to the part of the recognition of the treaty by the Armenian side and the links as bases. It was direct opposite of what was written here. Aregakn (talk) 23:23 GMT 15/02/2010
I ask you for proper sources then, as the fact that this treaty has been accepted by the international community. Claiming this theory is void is something that I can't take your word for and thus I need sources. --Armanalp (talk) 21:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sources? Sources of what? Sources of it being signed by the sides mentioned? Tell me what exact sources. And there is a way of asking references. It's putting a tag befor you delete it.Aregakn (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged the "The Questioned Validity of the Treaty" section, which is questionable and completely unreferenced. Such questionable assertions need a reference. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted part of another article from lead section.[edit]
Hello everyone,
As the part I deleted was quite large I thought I should explain myself here. Because the subject matter is probably contested.
The paragraph was, as can be seen in the page history, a large part of the Battle of Sardarabad article. I don't know how this treaty is related to that, but what I do know is that this large text can't just be copy-pasted. I can't judge on the text itself, I know very little about it. However this text should not be here. I've added a link to the article from which all the text comes to prevent that we lose information.
I have just modified one external link on Treaty of Kars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.