This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William D. Leahy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Las memorias de Leahy does not contain part of the diaries but two versions of his memoirs on the Puerto Rican governorship which I found among his papers in Wisconsin a his son William H released to me. I am the editor of that book, Jorge Rodríguez Beruff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.50.125.84 (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've moved over the important information. If someone wants to delete Admiral Leahy article, they're welcome to do so.
Admiral Leahy was of the utmost importance in Franco-American relations and this section desperately needs expansion. His seduction (figurative) by Petain and Darlan poisoned Franco-American relations for generations. Leahy's views became Roosevelts... and it is mentioned in Churchill's Memoirs of the Second World War. V. Joe (talk) 02:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"In his most controvertial role..." Says who?[edit]
There is no citation for the claim in the opening blurb that Leahy's Ambassadorship to France was "his most controversial role." Is this actually cited anywhere in any outstanding literature, or is this just yet more partisan character assassination coming from some hack armchair historian? Citations, please. Thank you 114.167.137.103 (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Leahy himself said it:『President Roosevelt sent me on one of the most controversial diplomatic missions of- the entire war period— that of being Ambassador to France.』Leahy, I was there page 3 Historians often repeat the theme: "Roosevelt in November 1940 had given Leahy the equally delicate and even more controversial assignment of US ambassador to Vichy France, a post he held for eighteen critical months." (Otis Graham, FDR Encyclopedia); Rjensen (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I removed a quote sourced from avn8.com. avn8.com does not provide sources for their quotes and in turn does not promote that their quotes are authentic. Please see the following statement from avn8.com: "These are just for fun. I have no idea whether the quotes are accurate or not. Loosely speaking, they support the idea that appeal to authority is unscientific". I am a bit surprised that anyone would consider avn8.com to be a worthy source as even it's owners seem to feel it is for entertainment purposes only. Monsieur Voltaire (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The reason that it is currently mdy is that this was the date format that the article was created with and I conformed to the original style (per MOS:DATERET) when I overhauled the article to bring it to featured. However, that puts the article at odds with the usual military dmy style prescribed in the MOS (MOS:MILFORMAT) and similar articles on other admirals like Ernest J. King, which use dmy format. Therefore, I am see king consensus to change the article style. Hawkeye7(discuss)01:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"... although the vessel only made it as far as the Azores before breaking down."[edit]
This line, written about a USS Constellation cruise that I presume happened after Leahy became a cadet in 1893, is not mentioned in Constellation's article. That article says:
In September 1892, Constellation recommissioned for another unusual duty, to help assemble works of art in Gibraltar for the World's Columbian Exposition. During the cruise, she made stops in Naples, Italy and Le Havre, France, before returning to New York in February 1893. Another training cruise to Gibraltar followed on 3 June and ended on 29 August. She was then transferred to Annapolis, where she was decommissioned on 2 September before being towed to Norfolk for repairs.
Which one is correct? Could Leahy's biographer have been mistaken (this article), or did DANFS omit mentioning the breakdown (that article)? Ed[talk][OMT]03:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source says (p. 9):
The cruise was supposed to last all summer, taking the young crewmen to Europe and back to learn their craft. Yet the Constellation was in a sorry state, smelly and leaky, and she broke down before reaching Europe. The crew had to stop in the Azores before the old ship could be made right to sail to America.
I did some additional digging, and it looks like the ship was damaged in Atlantic storms while on that mid-year cruise to Europe. From The Admirals (no page indicated on Google Books, but I assume it's in the Leahy chapter):
Constellation was scheduled to take the green-gilled cadets all the way to Europe, but stormy seas in the mid-Atlantic diverted the ship first to the Azores and then to the Madeira Islands for repairs. By the time the work was done, Constellation stood westward to return to Annapolis for the start of the academic year.
The lack of a page number is a bummer. USNI adds "The Constellation's last summer practice cruise for midshipmen extended to the Azores and Madeira. Upon her return to Annapolis ..." Ed[talk][OMT]04:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have a copy of The Admirals. The quotation is on pages 16 to 17. (The page break occurs after "westward to".) It is indeed the Leahy chapter (chapter 1). No references however. Hawkeye7(discuss)07:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
