Contents

Talk:Yangtze Delta

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

City rank[edit]

The rank of the cities (except Nanjing and Hangzhou as the capitals) is now according to 《长三角区域城市综合竞争力评价》by上海社会科学院城市化发展研究中心(now 上海社会科学院城市与区域研究中心). However, I only find the data for 2010/2009/2008 through the Internet (no data for two cities in Anhui). If some one has the data for 2011 (I think it was issued in November 2011), please update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poppopsun (talk • contribs) 06:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A sentence or two about this might be useful, where the article mentions the population density. Peoplesunionpro 03:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hanyu pinyin and city name ? Essentially the same —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.240.222.225 (talk) 09:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The tones are important. The pinyin names shouldn't be removed, though it's possible they could be reformated (e.g., as scroll-over text). MOS-ZH usually (and rightly) frowns on using tone marks in the English-language running text but you could make the argument that this is a table and just use the pinyin names for the English links. On net, the present setup is probably the most user-friendly, if a little ugly. — LlywelynII 05:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Provinces (PRC) has another good treatment. They layer the pinyin under the characters. — LlywelynII 06:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This map most certainly is not the "narrow geographical sense" of the Yangtze Delta. Hangzhou's watershed has nothing whatsoever to do with the Yangtze. What is this area? The original Shanghai Economic Area? The present Yangtze River Delta Economic Coordination Association? and why is Nanjing (of all places) specially shaded? It needs to be explained much better than what we currently have here and at Shanghai. — LlywelynII 05:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. See good reasons and general agreement below to rename this article as requested. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  01:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was proposed in this section that Yangtze River Deltaberenamed and movedtoYangtze Delta. The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links: current log • target log

Yangtze River Delta → Yangtze Delta

Ought to be the "Yangtze River Delta" when the river is just called the "Yangtze"? We have Pearl River (China) and Pearl River Delta, but Mekong and Mekong Delta, and Nile and Nile Delta. The internal logic seems to be that where the river already has a word for river in it, or is a word for river, then "River" is omitted from both the main page and related pages. In this regard, this page is inconsistent with both precedent on Wikipedia, and a little strange insofar as translated, it would come out as "River River Delta". I recommend a rename to just "Yangtze Delta". AllenY99 (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. I've just declined an informal but I think well-reasoned WP:MOVE request, as it I think it needs further discussion. Your opinions about this? Happy to self-revert and change the page name if you think that would be the better article title. 彼得in澳大利亚 aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a logical move and consistent with other page names. Also if you look for Yangtze Delta, there are sources using that name, although some still use Yangtze River Delta. Viztor (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

This is the document written by Chinese Goverment.The Yangtze Delta is more bigger than before now.^[1] And this is the newly document of Yantze Delta's transportation,it is also written by the Chinese Goverment.things changes so quakly now.^[2]5.252.193.212 (talk) 14:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nanjingnan123 (article contribs).

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2022 and 21 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Neruall4, Sh7039 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: 1jsjs0q77, Soft Sweets R.

— Assignment last updated by 1jsjs0q77 (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1.Yangtze Delta#cite note-govcn-10 this link is not reliable for the information in the article about population and city.

2.https://www.pbs.org/journeytoplanetearth/hope/yangtze.html this link is not reliable.

3. http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/chinadata/shanghai.htm this link is not reliable

4. http://csj.xinhuanet.com/2006-11/28/content_8659287.htm this link is not reliable

5.http://www.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/qy/550016.htm this link is not reliable

6.http://www.xinhuanet.com/2019-05/15/c_1124498242.htm this link is not reliable

7.http://www.people.com.cn/GB/jingji/8215/37562/37563/2785887.html this link is not reliable

suggest to remove these link Sh7039 (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]