The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Interesting: - Note: Main hook is a bit like a news item, but I find ALT1 interesting enough.
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Approved for ALT1. I would maybe change "supported" for "campaigned on" or "explicitly campaigned on". That has sourcing in the article to support. Up to you Acebulf(talk | contribs) 03:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
@Acebulf: Hi! Not really sure what the next steps are (again, first time doing this). I think I like the wording that Daniel McCaffery campaigned on protecting abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues?; thoughts on that version? HouseBlastertalk 23:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
That wording is great! On the process, now that it's been approved someone will pick it up and place it in one of the staging areas, and then it will be on the front page. I don't know that either of us has anything left to do. Cheers! Acebulf(talk | contribs) 01:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Alright, I have added it as ALT2! HouseBlastertalk 04:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Main hook is a bit like a news item, but I find ALT1 interesting enough.
Approved for ALT1. I would maybe change "supported" for "campaigned on" or "explicitly campaigned on". That has sourcing in the article to support. Up to you Acebulf (talk | contribs) 03:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
