The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promotedbyBruxtontalk 01:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Improved to GA today (March 10). Article is long enough and hook is interesting and inline cited to Scottish Field which, while I haven't heard of, appears to be WP:RS by all indications. Image has a cc-by-2.0 license. Earwig returns 3.8% (violation unlikely). Clear once QPQ done (Kj cheetham - please ping me and I'll replace the tick). Good job! Chetsford (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@Kj cheetham and TonyTheTiger: I do not see that in our article where the 2019 sale was the most expensive. I also do not think that bit is needed so I will WP:DYKTRIM and if you disagree we can carry on at dyk talk. Bruxton (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
ALT0a: ... that Illieston House(pictured), a castle built around 1600, was sold for £890,000 in 2019?
Improved to GA today (March 10). Article is long enough and hook is interesting and inline cited to Scottish Field which, while I haven't heard of, appears to be WP:RS by all indications. Image has a cc-by-2.0 license. Earwig returns 3.8% (violation unlikely). Clear once QPQ done (Kj cheetham - please ping me and I'll replace the tick). Good job! Chetsford (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
We are in WP:QPQ backlog mode. Double reviews are required.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for the confustion.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
