Contents

Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Kronlid

Julia Kronlid[edit]

Julia Kronlid

• ... that .... Swedish politician Julia Kronlid (pictured) believes that human evolution should not be the only theory taught to children in schools?

  ALT1 ... that .... politician Julia Kronlid (pictured)has stated that she does not believe in the evolutionary theory, but that she believes in "creationism"?

  ALT2... that .... politician Julia Kronlid (pictured) has worked as a volunteer nurse for the Pingstmission development work at a hospital clinic in Papua New Guinea?

• ALT3... that .... Swedish politician Julia Kronlid (pictured) has criticized that 30% of foreign aid would be taken to be used to finance immigration into Sweden?

  ALT4... that .... politician Julia Kronlid (pictured) has worked as a volunteer at a hospital clinic in Papua New Guinea?

• Reviewed: Zofia Glazer and Cypora Zonszajn

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self-nominated at 16:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC).

• QPQ done. Article is new and long enough, photo OK (but may not be ideal for front page). I may have missed something, but at two instances I could not find info in text backed up by the sources given, which is somewhat concerning. One instance is the claim of belief in creationism. Probably correct info, but I couldn't see it explicitly cited in source. (I have tagged the other example in the article). Main hook is interesting, sourced, short enough and as she is a politician probably OK with regard to BLP even if the info may be controversial. I didn't see outright copyvio/close paraphrasing, talk page gives attribution to the Swedish version of the article. (BabbaQ) Iselilja (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry for late reply Iselilja. But I think I have taken care of the issues at hand. Let me know what you think.BabbaQ (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, BabbaQ. I still don't see in the provided sources though that Kronlid has stated she believes in creationism. What I can see is that she has stated she does not (fully) believe in the evolution theory, and commentators are referring to her as a creationist. But the sentence as it stands now (in article and hook) can imo lead to believe that she herself has used the label creationism about her beliefs. (Which she well might have done, but I can not see it in the sources). Iselilja (talk) 12:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

OK, to make it easier I have again striked that ALT hook. And we can go for the original hook. Tell me what you think.BabbaQ (talk) 12:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I removed the phrase from the article as well, it needs to be slightly rephrased if included. I also think the original hook should be somewhat reworded; because strictly speaking no-one belives that the theory of human evolution is the only theory that should be taught in school they do learn theories on a variety of issues). And I am not sure we should (indirectly) refer to human evolution as a theory, as it is considered a scientific fact. So, I would welcome alternative hook wordings (something like she wants the school to teach alternatives to human evolution). Iselilja (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I have added two new hooks.BabbaQ (talk) 14:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I think ALT 3 is grammatically problematic. As for ALT 2, I don't see all the information in the given source (pingstbevegelsen) and "nurse" is wrong/misleading as she is not a registered nurse , but otherwise that might be all right. I have written an alternative ALT 4 an OK the review for that (so we hopefully don't need to spend more time on this). Iselilja (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! BabbaQ (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)