The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promotedbyYoninah (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Overall: Article was a very good and intriguing read. No problems in terms of length (~1,955 characters) with page recently created (13 March 2019). Article itself is adequately sourced by reliable sources, neutral in tone, and free of any plagiarism/copyright/possible close paraphrasing. The hook is cited and interesting (an example of individuals discouraged from doing what they want to pursue, and in turn, become successful/notable for such (good on her)). Additionally, hook is sizable in length, in broadness interesting, and in proper format. No images and thus no problems in copyright. If I had to input something, I would add a small sentence about her death from the Radiology journal just to conclude with after her retirement so it wholly encompasses her life (in summation). Well done! Adog (Talk・Cont) 22:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but it's unclear to me how she meets WP:BIO. Other than her write-up by the American Association for Women Radiologists, what did she do that is notable? (BTW that article speaks about a 50-year teaching career, which is not mentioned in the Wikipedia article.) Yoninah (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
@Yoninah: I believe the article meets WP:GNG as shown by the sources. Feel free to nominate for AfD if you disagree. 97198 (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
@97198: please add her notability to the lead. Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
@Yoninah: There is no DYK rule requiring this and it is shameful that this DYK has been held up over a month over this trivial issue. Regardless, I have added a summary of one of her awards to the lead to make it more clear to the lazy reader that she is notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Restoring tick per Adog's review. Yoninah (talk) 16:10, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Article was a very good and intriguing read. No problems in terms of length (~1,955 characters) with page recently created (13 March 2019). Article itself is adequately sourced by reliable sources, neutral in tone, and free of any plagiarism/copyright/possible close paraphrasing. The hook is cited and interesting (an example of individuals discouraged from doing what they want to pursue, and in turn, become successful/notable for such (good on her)). Additionally, hook is sizable in length, in broadness interesting, and in proper format. No images and thus no problems in copyright. If I had to input something, I would add a small sentence about her death from the Radiology journal just to conclude with after her retirement so it wholly encompasses her life (in summation). Well done! Adog (Talk・Cont) 22:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but it's unclear to me how she meets WP:BIO. Other than her write-up by the American Association for Women Radiologists, what did she do that is notable? (BTW that article speaks about a 50-year teaching career, which is not mentioned in the Wikipedia article.) Yoninah (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
