The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promotedbyAmakuru (talk) 07:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Overall: ALT0 is definitely interesting - I would prefer the promoter pick it. No glaring copyvio or sourcing issues found at first glance; Earwig gives a "violation possible" remark for a Guardian interview, but it's just catching a really lengthy quote, so I give it a pass. The "awards and nominations" hook did not have Portman's name in bold. As for the "on this day" appearance, her name did appear in bold, but it was not part of a prose entry. So those two main page appearances do not affect the eligibility of the hook. Your Power 🐍 💬 "What did I tell you?" 📝 "Don't get complacent..." 09:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
To Prep 6. — Amakuru (talk) 07:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
ALT0 is definitely interesting - I would prefer the promoter pick it. No glaring copyvio or sourcing issues found at first glance; Earwig gives a "violation possible" remark for a Guardian interview, but it's just catching a really lengthy quote, so I give it a pass. The "awards and nominations" hook did not have Portman's name in bold. As for the "on this day" appearance, her name did appear in bold, but it was not part of a prose entry. So those two main page appearances do not affect the eligibility of the hook. Your Power 🐍 💬 "What did I tell you?"
