The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promotedbyYoninah (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Created by Fitindia (talk). Self-nominated at 11:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC).
New enough, barely long enough. The article has some grammar issues, and the citation formatting isn't complete or consistent. No copyvio, but parts of the article should be rewritten to meet the Manual of Style. The hook is good, interesting, neutral, and cited. QPQ is done. The article can be eligible after considerable revisions. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hameltion, I have tweaked it please do have a look. Thank you. FITINDIA 16:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
@Fitindia: I've just done many more fixes to the article, and it's too short now (1166 characters). If you wish to expand it by 5 times, it could be nominated again. At the moment, there just isn't enough. Sorry about that. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 17:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Hameltion, thank you for the effort I guess just not enough info to take this forward. FITINDIA 08:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
@Hameltion and Fitindia: Added a few more details and expanded the lead. The article is now at about 1,524 characters. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Some parts are still a little repetitive, and someone else should do a new review. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 20:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that when her husband was shot by police during a Quit India protest march, Tara Rani Srivastava bandaged his wounds with her sari and continued leading the march?
New reviewer needed. --Usernameunique (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is now long enough and was new enough when nominated. The problems mentioned above have been dealt with, the ALT1 hook is more interesting than the original, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
New enough, barely long enough. The article has some grammar issues, and the citation formatting isn't complete or consistent. No copyvio, but parts of the article should be rewritten to meet the Manual of Style. The hook is good, interesting, neutral, and cited. QPQ is done. The article can be eligible after considerable revisions. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
@Fitindia: I've just done many more fixes to the article, and it's too short now (1166 characters). If you wish to expand it by 5 times, it could be nominated again. At the moment, there just isn't enough. Sorry about that. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 17:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed. --Usernameunique (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is now long enough and was new enough when nominated. The problems mentioned above have been dealt with, the ALT1 hook is more interesting than the original, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but note that the QPQ was already used for Template:Did you know nominations/Priya Jhingan. (The QPQ also was not complete; it needs to cover the five main DYK criteria.) Yoninah (talk) 20:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
