 | This template is used on approximately 16,000 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandboxor/testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
The {{Failed verification}} tag is used when an editor tried to verify the information in an article with its sources, but failed to do so. The tag will categorise articles into Category:All articles with failed verification. This template is a self-reference and thus is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopedic content. This template should only be used with references that exist, but do not support the information they claim to.
Use this tag only if:
For example, if the article says that 26% of statistics are made up, and the source says that statistics are made up without giving a percentage, then that information has failed verification. If you are unable to fix the error, then you should tag the information as not matching the named source. If the discrepancy between the source and the article isn't obvious, then please explain the situation in detail on the talk page.
If the source given is an unreachable website, keep the source and mark it with {{Dead link}} instead. See Wikipedia:Link rot and WP:DEADREF for more information.
If no source is given, and you believe that an inline citation is necessary for that information, then use {{Citation needed}}.
If the source has absolutely no relevance to any part of the article, delete the reference and replace with {{Citation needed}}.
The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:
<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Failed verification|date=June 2024}} Next sentence in the article.
{{Failed verification|date=June 2024}}
Link to the relevant section on the current page's talk page with:
|talk=Section titleor to a discussion elsewhere with:
|talkpage=Talk:Page nameor:
|talkpage=Talk:Page name#Section titleAdd a brief note on the nature of the verification failure with:
|reason=A sentence here.This is displayed as a mouse-over tooltip, and may be of use to later editors trying to resolve the verification issue.
TemplateData for Failed verification
The template will categorize articles into [[:Category:All articles with failed verification]].
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month and year | date | Provides the month and year (e.g. 'January 2013', but not 'jan13').
| String | suggested |
| Current page's relevant talk section | talk | Title of the appropriate section of the current page's talk page, for further discussion of the verification failure (e.g. 'Section title'). | String | optional |
| Another page's relevant talk section | talkpage | Title of the appropriate section of another page's talk page, for further discussion of the verification failure (e.g. 'Talk:Page name#Section title'). | String | optional |
| Reason | reason | A brief note, displayed as a mouse-over tooltip. May be of use to later editors. | String | optional |
{{Failed verification span}}: Use when inline citations have been supplied which support some portion of the statement in question, but not all of it.{{Text-source inline}}: Use when multiple inline citations to a source are given, but not all of them support the same information.{{Unreliable source?}}: Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.{{Unreliable source?|certain=y}}: Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is an unreliable source.{{Cite check}}: Use when the article or section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations (generates a hatnote).{{Verify source}}
