Unbiased rendering

Type of rendering in computer graphics

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve ittomake it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Within the field of computer graphics, unbiased rendering refers to any rendering technique that does not introduce systematic error, or bias, into the radiance approximation. The term refers to statistical bias, not the broader meaning of subjective bias. Because of this, an unbiased rendering technique can produce a reference image^{[clarification needed]} to compare against renders that use other techniques. In simple terms, unbiased rendering tries to mimic the real world as closely as possible without taking short cuts. Path tracing and its derivatives can be unbiased, whereas ray tracing was originally biased.

Mathematical definition[edit]

Mathematically speaking, the expected value (E) of an unbiased estimator is the population mean, regardless of the number of observations. The error found in a render produced by an unbiased rendering technique is due to random statistical variance, which manifests as high-frequency noise. Variance is reduced by ${\displaystyle n}$ (standard deviationby${\displaystyle {\sqrt {n}}}$) for ${\displaystyle n}$ data, meaning that four times as many data are needed to halve the standard deviation of the error; this makes unbiased rendering techniques less attractive for realtime or interactive applications. This means that an image produced by an unbiased renderer that appears noiseless and smooth is probabilistically correct.

Abiased rendering method is not necessarily wrong, and can still produce images close to those given by the rendering equation if the estimator is consistent. These methods, however, introduce a certain bias error (usually in the form of a blur)^{[citation needed]} in efforts to reduce the variance (high-frequency noise). Often biased rendering is optimized to compute faster at the cost of accuracy.

Caustics example[edit]

It is important to note that an unbiased technique cannot consider all possible paths (because there is an infinite number of them), and may not select the ideal paths for a given render (because to select certain paths over others introduces bias). Path tracing, an unbiased approach at its core, cannot consistently handle caustics generated from a point light source, as it is highly unlikely to randomly generate the singular path that directly reflects into the point.

Progressive photon mapping (PPM), a biased rendering technique, can actually handle caustics quite well. Although biased, PPM is provably consistent, meaning that as the number of samples goes to infinity, the bias error goes to zero (like an unbiased technique), and the probability that the estimate is correct reaches one.

List of unbiased rendering methods[edit]

• Path tracing
• Bidirectional path tracing
• Metropolis light transport and the related "energy redistribution path tracing" (ESPT)^[1]

List of unbiased renderers[edit]

• Arion
• Arnold^[2]
• Cycles
• Kerkythea
• LuxRender
• Mantra
• Maxwell Render
• Octane Render
• Fstorm Render (external link)

See also[edit]

• Global illumination (GI)
• Physically based rendering (PBR)
• Non-photorealistic rendering (NPR)

References[edit]

Bibliography[edit]

This computer graphics–related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.