Parliaments and legislative bodies around the world impose certain rules and standards during debates. Tradition has evolved that there are words or phrases that are deemed inappropriate for use in the legislature whilst it is in session.
In a Westminster system, this is called unparliamentary language and there are similar rules in other kinds of legislative systems. This includes, but is not limited to, the suggestion of dishonesty or the use of profanity. Most unacceptable is any insinuation that another memberisdishonourable. So, for example, in the British House of Commons any direct reference to a member as lying is unacceptable, even if the allegation is substantively true.[1] A conventional alternative, when necessary, is to complain of a "terminological inexactitude".[citation needed]
Exactly what constitutes unparliamentary language is generally left to the discretion of the Speaker of the House. Part of the speaker's job can be to enforce the assembly's debating rules, one of which is that members may not use "unparliamentary" language. That is, their words must not offend the dignity of the assembly. In addition, legislators in some places are protected from prosecution and civil actions by parliamentary immunity which generally stipulates that they cannot be sued or otherwise prosecuted for anything spoken in the legislature. Consequently, they are expected to avoid using words or phrases that might be seen as abusing that immunity.
Like other rules that have changed with the times, speakers' rulings on unparliamentary language reflect the tastes of the period. The Table, the annual journal of the Society of Clerks-at-the-TableinCommonwealth Parliaments, includes a list of expressions ruled unparliamentary that year in the national and regional assemblies of its members.[2]
In the Australian Senate, the words "liar" and "dumbo" were ordered to be withdrawn and deemed unparliamentary during a session in 1997.[3]
Profanity is almost always considered unparliamentary language in both houses of the Australian Parliament, and in all other Australian legislatures. Hence, the words fuck and cunt are almost always avoided. However, other words such as shit and bullshit are more commonly used, but are still generally considered unparliamentary.[4]
"He is so arrogant and out of touch and thinks himself so great that he is the only member in this House who could polish the chandeliers with his nose, because he is constantly looking over and out above everybody."
"The scab nurses' union and the scab ambulance union did not stand up for their supposed members..."
"...as opposed to the member for Maryborough, who not only looks like a clown but sounds like one and behaves like one."
"Bugger. I was on a roll. Sorry."
"...and said the team's main KPI was to provide media which would 'give the Labor minister a stiffy'."
"We get the balance of power, very simply that means that we have the testicles of the Government in our hand at every given stage" [quoting from a source]
Steve then went on to use three angry emojis and two swearing emojis
They were exciting times in my household during that era because my son very proudly was the "arse of the ass"
In Belgium, there is no such thing as unparliamentary language. A member of parliament is allowed to say anything they wish when inside parliament. This is considered necessary in Belgium to be able to speak of a democratic state and is a constitutional right.[citation needed] Nevertheless, when on 27 March 2014, Laurent Louis called the Prime Minister Elio Di Rupo a pedophile, the other members of parliament left the room in protest.[6] This immunity that manifests itself in an absolute freedom of speech when in parliament does not exist when outside of parliament. In that case, prosecution is possible when and if the majority of parliament decides so.[citation needed]
In the Parliament of Fiji, there has been debate over what is considered unparliamentary language. In 2021, then-Speaker RatuEpeli Nailatikau ruled that the word "imbecile" was not considered unparliamentary language.[26]
In 2012, the Indian Parliament published a book of words and phrases that were considered to be unparliamentary:[28]
Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves, bad man, badmashi, bandicoot, blackmail, blind, deaf and dumb, bluffing, bribe, bucket of shit, communist, confused mind, dacoit, darling (said to a female MP), deceive, double-minded, double-talk, downtrodden, goonda, lazy, liar, loudmouth, lousy, nuisance, racketeer, radical extremist, rat, ringmaster, scumbag, thief, thumbprint (to an illiterate MP)
In July 2022, the Lok Sabha Secretariat came up with a booklet of unparliamentary words with an additional list of the following:[29][30]
InDáil Éireann, the lower house of the Oireachtas (Irish parliament), the chair (Ceann Comhairle or replacement) rules in accordance with standing orders on disorderly conduct, including prohibited words, expressions, and insinuations.[31] If the chair rules that an utterance is out of order, then typically the member withdraws the remark and no further action occurs.[32] The relevant words are retained in the Official Report transcription despite being formally withdrawn.[33] The chair cannot rule if they did not hear the words alleged to be unparliamentary.[34] A member who refuses to withdraw a remark may be suspended and must leave the chamber.[35] A periodically updated document, Salient Rulings of the Chair, lists past rulings,
ordered by topic, with reference to the Official Report.[31][36][37] Rulings superseded by subsequent changes to standing orders are omitted.[31] It is disorderly for one Teachta Dála (TD; deputy) to "call another Deputy names",[38] specifically including:[39]
or to insinuate that a TD is lying[40] or drunk.[41] The word "handbagging" is unparliamentary "particularly with reference to a lady member of the House".[42] Allegations of criminal or dishonourable conduct against a member can only be made by a formal motion.[43] Conduct specifically ruled on includes selling one's vote, violation of cabinet confidentiality,[44] and doctoring the Official Report.[45] Charges against a member's political party are allowed; the chair decides whether an allegation is "personal" or "political".[46] Members may not refer to the Dáil or its proceedings as a:[47]
circus, farce, slander machine.
During a December 2009 debate, Paul Gogarty said, "With all due respect, in the most unparliamentary language, fuck you Deputy [Emmet] Stagg."[48][36] He immediately apologised and withdrew the remark.[48][36] The debate's temporary chairman at the time lacked the Ceann Comhairle's power to suspend disorderly members;[49] in any case, once Gogarty withdrew the remark he was not out of order, although his words led to general disorder in the chamber.[50] Gogarty's apology noted ("rather tenuously"[51]) that the word fuck was not explicitly listed in the Salient Rulings.[52][53] Ensuing calls for tougher sanctions led the Dáil Committee on Procedure and Privileges (CPP) to refer the matter to a subcommittee,[53][54] which said the correct response was for the CPP to issue a formal rebuke, as had in fact been done to Gogarty.[55]
After heated interruptions to a November 2012 debate, Ceann Comhairle Seán Barrett said "This is not a shouting match, like gurriers on a street shouting at each other."[56] A spokesperson said gurriers was not out of order since it was not addressed at an individual.[34]
In Italian history, the unparliamentarian language was the only limit to free speech of a deputy. So it was claimed by Giacomo Matteotti in his last discourse in the Chamber of Deputies:
I ask to speak not prudently, nor imprudently, but parliamentarianly
In addition, during the Republic, the use of foul language in Parliament produced jurisprudence by the constitutional court, which has implemented the libel suits.[58]
The Parliament of New Zealand maintains a list of words, and particularly phrases, that the Speaker has ruled are unbecoming, insulting, or otherwise unparliamentary. These include:[59]
Members hated the sight of khaki (1943)
I would cut the honourable gentleman's throat if I had the chance (1946)
idle vapourings of a mind diseased (1946)
his brains could revolve inside a peanut shell for a thousand years without touching the sides (1949)
Member not fit to lick the shoes of the Prime Minister (1959)
energy of a tired snail returning home from a funeral (1963)
Could go down the Mount Eden sewer and come up cleaner than he went in (1974)
Intestinal fortitude (1974)
Racist (1977)
The Arapawa Goat (1980)
Ditch the bitch (1980)
The Parliament also maintains a list of language that has been uttered in the House, and has been found not to be unparliamentary; this includes:
On 11 July 2023, PAP MP Tan Chuan-Jin made a public apology to WP MP Jamus Lim after a clip of him using "unparliamentary language" during a 17 April parliamentary sitting was shared on Reddit. As Speaker of Parliament, Tan was heard saying "fucking populist" shortly after Lim had finished a 20-minute speech urging the PAP government to further help lower-income groups and to establish an official poverty line. Lim accepted his apology.
In addition, accusations of "crooked deals" or insinuation of the use of illicit drugs by a member are considered unparliamentary language (all attributable to Dennis Skinner).[67] An accusation that an MP's presence in the house has "been bought" is also unparliamentary.[68]
In 2019, in the run up to the Conservative leadership election, SNP leader Ian Blackford accused Boris Johnson of being a racist. Asked to withdraw the term by the speaker, Blackford confirmed that he had informed Johnson about his intention to use it and qualified his statement. The speaker then allowed it to stand.[71] In the following week he accused Johnson of being a liar ("has made a career out of lying"). No request was made by the speaker to withdraw this statement.[72]
In 2021, LabourMPDawn Butler was ejected from the Commons for accusing Boris Johnson of lying repeatedly to the House. When asked by the deputy speaker to "reflect on her words" after the first statement, Butler replied "It's funny that we get in trouble in this place for calling out the lie, rather than the person lying" whereupon she was ordered to withdraw from the House.[73]
It is not unparliamentary to accuse an MP of lying if the accusation forms the basis of a substantive motion in the House. This allowed, for example, John Profumo to be censured by the House in 1963 after he had been found to have lied to the police as part of the Profumo affair,[74] and Boris Johnson in 2023 after the Committee of Privileges found he had repeatedly lied to Parliament regarding his knowledge of illegality during the Partygate affair.[75]
The mention of the word "batshit" by the Shadow Home Secretary in November 2023[76] was not regarded as unparliamentary in that no intervention was made by the Speaker during the debate.[77] It also wasn't raised in any of the points of order soon after.[78] Search of House of Commons Hansard reveals a number of occasions involving the word "shit" that have gone without intervention in recent times including mention by Boris Johnson as Prime Minister in September 2019.[79] Although the Mirror newspaper called this "very unparliamentary",[80] the Speaker did not in fact intervene. As regards euphemisms, the word "effing" was criticized as unparliamentary by the Speaker during one of the Brexit debates but the mention of the phrase "eff business" by Keir Starmer during a more recent session of Prime Minister's Questions did not cause intervention.
The Speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly, William Hay, gave a ruling in the chamber on 24 November 2009 on unparliamentary language.[81] In essence rather than making judgements on the basis of particular words or phrases that have been ruled to be unparliamentary in the Assembly or elsewhere the Speaker said that he would judge members' remarks against standards of courtesy, good temper and moderation which he considered to be the standards of parliamentary debate. He went on to say that in making his judgement he would consider the nature of members' remarks and the context in which they were made. In 2013, Hay ruled that insinuation of MLAs being members of proscribed organizations was unparliamentary language.[82]
In the US, representatives were censured for using unparliamentary language in the House of Representatives throughout its history.[vague][citation needed] Other levels of government have similar disciplinary procedures dealing with inappropriate words spoken in the legislature.
It is a point of pride among some British MPs to be able to insult their opponents in the House without using unparliamentary language. Several MPs, notably Sir Winston Churchill, have been considered masters of this game.[citation needed]
Some terms which have evaded the Speaker's rules are:
Clare Short implicitly accused the Employment minister Alan Clark of being drunk at the dispatch box shortly after her election in 1983, but avoided using the word, saying that Clark was "incapable". Clark's colleagues on the Conservative benches in turn accused Short of using unparliamentary language and the Speaker asked her to withdraw her accusation. Clark later admitted in his diaries that Short had been correct in her assessment. In 1991, Speaker Bernard Weatherill adjudged that usage of the word "jerk" by Opposition leader Neil Kinnock, who had applied that epithet to Robert Adley, was not unparliamentary language.[84]
