Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Requests  



1.1  B-17 Flying Fortress  





1.2  BillCJ's requests  





1.3  Shorts aircraft  





1.4  3 requests  





1.5  Su-17M4  





1.6  CF-105 Arrow  





1.7  DhruvK's requests  





1.8  OH-58 Kiowa  





1.9  PeterCalamy's requests  





1.10  S. Cisar's requests  





1.11  The Land: Steam Turbine animation  





1.12  SZD gliders  







2 PZL Bielsko  














User:Emoscopes/Requests

















User page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< User:Emoscopes

Orthography requests
Please leave a request here for any aircaft 3-view drawings you would like me to produce for Wikimedia Commons. Please give as much contextual information as you can, for instance;
  1. Is there a particular mark or model you would prefer?
  2. Is there a special feature of the aircraft you would like to be obvious
  3. Are there any unusual variants you would like included to highlight differences.

I will respond to your requests here so please add this page to your watch list. I will endeavour to fulfil your requests to the best of my ability, however, please don't be offended if it takes me a short while to respond, or if I just cannot fulfil your request.
Thanks for your patience and understanding! Emoscopes Talk

Requests[edit]

B-17 Flying Fortress[edit]

Would prefer the G variant, if only one is chosen, but perhaps a few nose sections could be compared.

OK, I'm on to that one. Emoscopes Talk 19:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Filled and added to the article. Please let me know if there are any glaring errors, I am not intimately familiar with American aircraft and I had to do some research to find out the major differences between models. Emoscopes Talk 17:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

BillCJ's requests[edit]

This list is going to be a doozy! I've been involved in creating sevreal new articles in the past few months, and most of them need 3-views. I'll try to be as specific as I can, but feel free to ask for clarifiaction or suggestions, either here or on my talk page. I don't expect you to do them all at once, or even in the next few weeks. I have no idea how long you take to do one 3-view, but I'm not in a hurry. Consider this a To-do List if you run short on other "orders". - BillCJ 05:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

OK Bill, that's quite a list :) But I shall see what I can do, it will just need a little time. Emoscopes Talk
P.S, I can normally knock out a few 3-views in a day, depending upon time and the quality of references I can find. Emoscopes Talk 07:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Shorts aircraft[edit]

You have already done a great side view of the Short Seamew - it enhances the article greatly! Thanks.

It would be really good to have a 3-view of the Short SB/4 Sherpa - I can send you a 3-view outline drawing if that would help you.

Filled and added to article. Emoscopes Talk 20:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Also the Short Bomber article would be greatly improved by a 3-view! But the list goes on and on! Thanks again! What a brilliant offer! TraceyR 13:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Filled and added to article. Emoscopes Talk 23:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Great stuff! Thanks. TraceyR 20:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you willing to produce 3-views of the SB/5 in its three different wing configurations (50°, 69° and 69° sweep)? The article was recently assessed as Start class, so perhaps the addition of this material would nudge it towards a better classification. I can scan in views of the 50° and 60° drawings as a basis and email them to you; I haven't yet found a view of the 69° configuration. Happy Hogmanay! --TraceyR (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Fantastic! That is a really useful contribution to the SB/5 article - thanks. I'll have to find out how to award you another barnstar!! --TraceyR (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

3 requests[edit]

One filled. Emoscopes Talk 15:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Su-17M4[edit]

You do incredible work, would you mind sharing some of your techniques? I would like to request Su-17M4/Su-22M4 for Sukhoi Su-17. The current 3-view is of the Su-17M2 which does not go with the M4 specs. Su-17M4 has a Su-17UM/Su-17M3 fuselage with the tall spine and a drooped nose, ram air scoop at the base of the tail, additional underwing pylons for AAMs, and in post-Afghanistan aircraft multiple (up to 12, depending on the specific aircraft) flare ejectors around the mid-fuselage. Thanks! - Emt147Burninate! 18:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Filled. Emoscopes Talk 21:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

CF-105 Arrow[edit]

I've seen your awesome art, and I think you should apply your skills to making a drawing of the CF-105. Please do the RL205 paint scheme (one of those orange and white Arrows). P.S. Can you do one of those colour images like you did for the TSR-2?Canada-kawaii 01:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Anyway, can you upload an SVG version of the image? That would rock. 142.179.125.143 01:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

DhruvK's requests[edit]

  • Airbus A320 - 318 - 321 (any and all would be appreciated!) Dhruvk 04:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

OH-58 Kiowa[edit]

  • Two variants. The OH-58A and the OH-58D. The current 3-view of the "OH-58D" is a profile of the OH-58A and doesn't resemble the OH-58D engine deck with or without the mast-mounted sight (MMS). --Born2flie 21:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

PeterCalamy's requests[edit]

As a naval enthusiast, I am hugely impressed with your ship views, both for their clarity and painstaking historical accuracy. Do you think you perhaps do views of the USS North Carolina (BB 55), USS South Dakota (BB 57), and USS Iowa (BB 61), all lead ships of their respective classes in the United States Navy. PeterCalamy 17:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, not an aeroplane! Emoscopes Talk 21:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

S. Cisar's requests[edit]

We would like to ask for permission using an image that we found on Wikipedia, please contact me at sasha at hosoyaschaefer dot com for a detailed request for permission. We would like to include your diagram of the Short SC1 for a documentary on mobility. Kind Regards, S. Cisar, HosoyaSchaefer Architects.

The Land: Steam Turbine animation[edit]

Is there any chance you could make an animation of a steam turbine? I made good use of [1] and [2]inPre-dreadnought battleship. Now I'm working on Dreadnought, and a good diagram of a turbine would really liven up that section of the article. Many thanks, The Land (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, not an aeroplane! Emoscopes Talk 21:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

SZD gliders[edit]

If you are still active can you do some three views of the Polish SZD gliders:-

PZL Bielsko[edit]

TaPetebutt (talk) 05:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Emoscopes/Requests&oldid=331176627"





This page was last edited on 11 December 2009, at 23:58 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki