You're doing a great job; you have corrected other things too, thank you very much! Of course I have no doubts about you, but I would like to know if you have deleted only my additions concerning British English or if you have also changed the consolidated English of some articles; thank you very much for your work. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There have been a few articles where I've come across an earlier switch that I've reverted (such as this 2014 edit to Ossobuco) and a few where I've changed mixed usage to British English to reflect earlier established usage. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 13:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, on the bruttiboni page, both the "biscuit" and the "cookie" form are used; what should be done in this situation? I don't intervene in such things, so I'm asking you. JacktheBrown (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! I don't know if you're interested, but I'm working on the tartufo page; in my opinion it's not good at all and should be improved. JacktheBrown (talk) 20:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrown Probably not, as I don't see any spellings in the original version of the article that are indicative of either British or American spellings. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 01:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrown If I left it, it's probably because I thought there was an established use of British English. For example, Canestrelli used "biscuits" from its first revision. I probably didn't remove it from Cassata since it has used "coloured" for a while, but looking at it now it has had "color" and "flavor" for even longer. I'll fix that one. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 17:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the pizza article has problems. A long time ago, the "Use British English" template was inserted, and not by me (so it's consolidated), but I noticed that there are non-English terms, such as "flavor"; I don't know all the American variants, could you take care of that? Thanks in advance. Update: I added the template, a month ago (I didn't remember it); here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pizza&diff=prev&oldid=1220888505. Please also check the pasta article. JacktheBrown (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Valereee and JackkBrown: WP:STYLEVAR says to use the first post-stub version of the article in which one of the applicable styles appeared, so that single-sentence article doesn't count. The first time a regional variant appeared in a multi-sentence version of the Pizza article that I could find was Special:Permalink/1229788 which uses "flavor". --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 13:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrownSpecial:PermanentLink/275787 is a one-sentence stub, which WP:STYLEVAR says doesn't count. "Favourite" was removed in the very first edit that expanded the article beyond a single sentence, and "flavor" was introduced a few edits later. You added the "Use British English" template in April 2024. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 13:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"You added the "Use British English" template in April 2024." I specified it. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think Ahecht has a point; that first version was a sentence. Jack, why are you arguing this so hard? It's simply not that important, and as I've told you many times, this rule was put into place to prevent this kind of disruption.Not because the variant of English is important. Wikipedia literally doesn't care which variant is used; at most we care that it's consistent within an article. Valereee (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I received your ping, but I only saw it after you had already removed the message with this edit. What was the reason for removing the message? I am fine with withdrawing the request. I should checked more thoroughly first. I was just confused on the back-and-forth with the response being added and then taken down only a few moments later. Aoba47 (talk) 01:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: I had initially replied that nothing had changed with regards to notability, but then almost immediately noticed that the character had had their own limited series since the last AfD and withdrew my statement. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 03:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the response. That is fair. I just wanted to double-check that I had not messed up anything on my end. I hope you are having a good day so far. Aoba47 (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ahecht, please undo this move. There was an ongoing discussion between me and Amuru before you moved it. Also help me add the move discussion tag back as I have reopened the talk page discussion. I need you to act urgently as it may appear in malformed move and more trouble elucidates.... Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 14:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SafariScribe Looks like Amakuru opposed after I performed the move, but before I could clear the request. I'll go ahead and unwind things. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 15:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Judeo-Christian navboxes/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect Raisi (disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 4 § Raisi (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 22:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
