Hello Aviram 7. I would appreciate help with a posted on Wikipedia a while ago. but I am busy at the moment. would you tell me how I can contact you later. Thanks Piara --Piara Atwal (talk) 03:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined speedy deletion for Draft:Gadar 2 (soundtrack)[edit]
I have declined your speedy deletion request for Draft:Gadar 2 (soundtrack). I have asked you previously to read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion. WP:G12 is for deleting an entire article where it is an unambiguous copyright violation. The situation in this draft was that it contained an overly large attributed quote in the reception section. This is obviously a credible claim of fair use. Furthermore, the draft should only be deleted "where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving". Aside from the quote, what other copied material was there? -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr Hareram Chauhan: Hello, I declined you're submission present sources are not seem reliable to me and I suggest to you please rectifying you're submission by adding reliable source and verfyable content.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)
Hey there, Aviram! Your earlier sentence needs a little tweaking. Could you take a moment to adjust it? It is confusing for newcomers. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DreamRimmer: Hi, Thanks!😊 for you're attention on in my usertalkpage, I've changed few sentence first to last, I think the sentence is not proved confusing for newcomers. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)13:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Youknowwhoistheman: Hello there! I'm doing good! and you are also fine... That's great!. okay.. I like to work on enwik sometimes hiwiki, metawiki.. etc.. I'd like to happy when you learning (something) from me on english Wikipedia. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)10:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. In Talk:Loni#Requested_move_26_December_2023, I don't see a substantive proof that we observed the policy described at WP:DETCON. I rebutted the other arguments made at length and with supplemental information; nobody made any effort to further discuss this. There is no real consensus there if there's no actual discussion. Please relist it instead.
@Joy: Hi, I think if discussion was closed before 7 days ago and I moved the page suggested by the requester, so, now they really need to relist them?😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)14:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Joy: Yes! You have reached this point too late as it has been too many days since the discussion ended. If I have made any mistake regarding that topic or discussion, I apologize to you.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)
Request on 09:36:36, 14 January 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Pinkchiken[edit]
Hello Aviram7,
thank you very much for looking at our draft so soon. Your wrote that "some sections are seems to be unsourced". Indeed, I see that we did not include any sources or web links in the sections
Interpretation
Targeting tree extinction risk
Conservation Partnerships
Scalability and Market Adoption
Would you expect a proper reference (using <ref></ref> or [ ]) in each section or are inline links (using [[ | ]]) fine as well?
@Pinkchiken: Hi,Please see your draft carefully from bottom to top you do not adding source in bottom of few section, please fill reference on it, you added more reference in few section, I suggest to you please remove few reference from them and add reference in last few unsourced section of in your draft.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)11:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
NAMASKAR AND RAM RAM AVIRAM7 , I AM FROM UTTRAKHAND I CREATED A DRAFT SHITLAKHET VILLAGE , YOU ADDED A COMMENT ON MY DRAFT TO ADD AN IMAGE OF THE PLACE I DID IT . PLEASE REVIEW IT AGAIN .
@Whatif222: Jai Sitaram-Jai Bajrangbali, Thank you for reaching out on my talkpage, I've fixed map releated issue, I think if you add more information on you're draft, so, It easily to evulate the subject's notability, and I see the draft is seem to me very short article releated to a tourism or place, if you add this topics releated more information like, tourism, location, geography of this place, then, I'd to happy accepted this draft. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)15:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion. I'm a bit puzzled, however, by your assessment of "no consensus." Two editors opposed the move, while none other than OP were in favour. Per WP:THREEOUTCOMES, this would appear to be a "Not moved" close. 162 etc. (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@162 etc.: Hi, Sorry for late reply, As far as there was no consensus in that performance request move request, the users participating in that discussion were only opposed,then I closed this request as no consensus, if I maked any fault during closed this discussion,so, I apologize to you about that.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)15:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I don't understand. Why did you choose "no consensus" when there was no support at all for the proposed title? Such a discussion would appear to be a consensus for "Not moved". 162 etc. (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reviewing my draft! However, I have a question? In your message, you stated that the article would be Stub-class. However, when I look in the article's talk page, it's rated B-class. Did you want to rate it Stub-class or B-class?
@Flux55: Hello,Thank you for reaching out on my usertalkpage, I've given stub class rating during you're draft acceptances, but when I going to adding importance rating on you're draft via rater tool, then I saw rater tool is predicted you're draft is B-class rated , so, I've changed you're draft rating according to rater tool. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)16:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@162 etc., Hello again, I have told you earlier also, when the following participants in that discussion were not in favor of moving that article but only opposed it, then in a way it was not a consensus because they did not want this article to be moved. Should be transferred to the new title.
If seen in one way, the meaning of not move is that in the following discussion, when most of the participants have clearly opposed it, then it can also be called no consensus even in other words.
@Milli's Boy thanks for reaching out on my talkpage ; I've reviewed you draft but I saw the film release date is currently not confirmed, but I've not declined you're draft,if this film date is confirmed in later, so, contact me on here or ping/email me, then I'd happy to accepted your draft. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)07:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the film release was confirmed by some articles and bookmyshow.com and also, the release date Posters were also posted by the Production company [1] and Hero of the film.[2] Please check
@Milli's Boy Hmmm.. I checked but I do not able read Telugu language, but I saw poster and I only read Feb 2nd but I think year is not mentioned on this poster? If any information releated to this film's release date, so, please give me (English or Hindi) language only, I not fully sure.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)07:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also when we search "Bootcut Balaraju movie release date" in google, the Knowledge Panel is Displaying the Release date of the film. If possible please check that too. Milli's Boy (talk) 08:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Milli's Boy Hi, Never Not! If DreamRimmer has declined you're Draft submission, so, I cannot accepted you're draft, I don't see the person is notable under WP:NBIO and WP:GNG and reference are not seem reliable or not providing sufficient WP:SIGCOV. please give some time to improve you're draft and established clearly notability to the subject, I don't not accepted you're draft but I've decided to declined you're draft. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)17:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your review, but could we possibly put the draft on hold rather than rejecting it? Thanks for your time in assessing the article. Milli's Boy (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Milli's Boy, No! In AFC Tool are not any option to draft on hold If you try to improving your draft after declining by other Afc reviewer, then, you firstly rectify them and after you're finished to rectify are completed of you're draft then you ensure your draft are ready for review, then you can submit for review again.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)17:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"I will wholeheartedly respect your decision. I am committed to polishing and enhancing the content, seamlessly incorporating new details and articles that underscore the person's significance."
Milli's Boy, Hi, I've decided to stop review draft on request, but I've reconsidered your request and go ahead to review you're draft, please carefully see my usertalkpage notice. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)07:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
To the contrary, you have demonstrated you are able to edit without WP:IPBE, having done so yesterday. You haven't explained the exceptional change that occurred between yesterday and today and haven't provided your specific IP address, only a range. Yamla (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 51.83.0.0/16. I use wifi to edit on Wikipedia, although I never faced such problem, but today while editing on Wikipedia I found that my IP is blocked, I have always contributed well and positively on Wikipedia, and good contribution. I will keep giving, please help me, otherwise I will not be able to edit on English Wikipedia.😔~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)16:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
That IP range is blocked as a webhost; it is not permitted to edit via webhost. Evidently you don't always edit from this range, as you successfully edited yesterday, 331dot (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi Aviram7. I've granted you IPBE for three days following your request; we can of course extend it further out if we find that this is needed (and assuming no objections are voiced). Other than that, you should be all set for now and until you can arrange to edit from another network. As 331dot and Yamla pointed out above in your declined unblock requests above, it looks like you have access to other networks; you will need to arrange a way to use them when you log in and contribute to Wikipedia moving forward. In fact, I wasn't aware of these two declined unblock requests until after I had already granted you IPBE moments before (that's 100% my fault and not yours). Had I seen them before granting IPBE, this would've become a discussion between me and them in order to determine the right action to take with your request. Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)21:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I wasn't aware that this request had been declined twice recently. I'm sending a courtesy ping toward 331dot and Yamla to make you both aware of the temporary IPBE that I granted here (it expires in 3 days). My sincere apologies in advance; I didn't see that there were two recent unblock requests that you had declined before I granted Aviram7 temporary IPBE. If you object to the temporary flag that I granted Aviram7, and want me to revoke the flag as opposed to just letting it expire in three days, please do not hesitate to let me know and I'll be happy to discuss that with you. ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)22:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Oshwah:, Hi there,There is no fault of yours in this, I should have told you about it but did not because of the hassle, thank you for giving me this right for three days, yes, it will take me some time to reach other networks. It will take. I will try my best to connect to another network as soon as possible, although I have mentioned on Meta's member page that I use (5G) network + wifi to edit on Wikipedia. You should not consider yourself guilty and I am the culprit, if any mistake has been made then I would like to apologize. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)05:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, how you placed the "orphan" template in the following article Dhruv Sharma (singer) I want to know the mechanism to remove it from what I read is "because it does not have a link in another Wikipedia, in the simplified English language does not work or as" I am waiting for your report 57ntaledane9 (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@57ntaledane9: Hi, Thanks for reaching out on my talkpage; Do you really understand what you're are saying here? I've identified this article orphaned, so, I've tagged as orphaned during examine of Dhruv Sharma (singer) article, orphaned mean on here when new article arr created by users and they do not link her article releated to similar article, so, it's is called orphan, let me know if you have any other question.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)17:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any way, I was looking at a deleted draft and noticed you made the following comment: Comment: Wikipedians are not permission to creating article himself on Wikipedia. This is not true. Autobiographies are discouraged but they are permitted. We have lots of articles from the early days of Wikipedia where article subjects started articles on themselves. It is discouraged but it's incorrect to say they are not "permitted" so please make sure that when you give advice to new editors that it is based in policy. It would help to quote the policy that is relevant and not just say what you think is true. Thank you.
Wow, you have a very busy User talk page. Any way you could remove, like, half of the boxes so that most of the content is comments from other editors? It seems very cluttered.
Regarding Draft Review Of Swami Shri Adgadanand Ji Maharaj[edit]
Hello Aviram, Thanks for posting your opinion,
I would like you to go through the below articles as a reference about notability about Swami Shri Adgadanand Ji Maharaj, Where Prime minister as well home ministers had a interaction on this topic matter. The articles are in Hindi Language.
Hope this counts as a notability. Rajesh 06:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therajeshjoshi (talk • contribs)
@Therajeshjoshi: Hello, Thank you for reaching out on my talkpage,I think you needed to add these newspaper reference on the subject's article with correct information and I think other afc reviewers are can reviewing you're draft as soon as possible.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)08:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do I upload images that I have personally taken? And what license do I need to give to them.
And how do I use images that someone else has created by used them in an article? e.g. A university website - I want to credit and copyright back to them but use it on the Wikipedia page itself. I have some links if that is helpful.
Quick update - worked out how to upload and licence my own photos (ones that I created).
Trying to work out how to link to or use others (that third-parties have created / own). Understanding what licensing needs to be put in place for those. I have reached out to the organisations for permission to use the media (images and video) from their publicly facing news articles. Will see what happens. I think this is the right approach.
Just looking through the documentation atm and real-world cases to see if this is how it is done or just copyright back to source.
Question from Ss ram (12:01, 19 February 2024)[edit]
Hello Sir, I created a new draft "Niranjan BS" a few days ago and submitted it for review. I put sincere efforts in providing all proper references and did not include any unverifiable data. It got revised same day where they removed a few references saying "Wikipedia is not a valid reference" which I did not earlier know. Next day, Citation bot revision was done and the article after that looked like: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Niranjan_BS&diff=prev&oldid=1208342275 . But today I'm shocked to see a user Krithika42 made some revisions. He/she had added birth date and family names. To be honest, I knew of these too but did not add them as I wanted to sincerely adhere to Wikipedia rules which state all the info we provide must be verifiable through formal media. No formal media evidence for these was available, so I did not add them. Also, he/she has revised the serial name "Ennenno Janmala Bandham" to "Ennenno janmala bandam" which is incorrect pronunciation. Plus has added a pronunciation "Nee-ran-jan" which is also incorrect. He/she has changed the chronological order of Notable Works too incorrectly. He/she has added a line "predominantly works in kannada films" which is also incorrect as that is not the artiste's predominant work, also you could see a lot of formatting mistakes. I had made my original draft painstakingly without any such errors, both formatting wise and content wise, so that it gets authorized as an article. He/she has not provided any references too. So this user has done all these incorrect revisions to an otherwise clearly verifiable and correct draft. Will this affect the draft's chances of approval as an article for no mistake of mine? Sir, please inform what should I do? Sir, will such persons keep ruining a correct draft/article in Wikipedia? This is very disappointing for me and I look forward to your valuable guidance. I thank you so much, sir, for your time and attention in this matter. --Ss ram (talk) 12:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, just wanted to update you that I undid those incorrect revisions citing proper reasons.
This guy has recently elected as member of parliament in Rajya Sabha and not yet assumed office passing NPOL. Kindly review this page as haste as possible, no hurries though. CSMention269 (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello sir, I'm a Turkish wikipedian (New at there aswell) and I recently started English Wikipedia. I saw that you are my mentor, so I have some questions!
I do not yet plan to engage in long edits, I thought that combatting vandalism would be a better start to my long journey of contributing English Wikipedia. How can I do that? Which methods should I watch and which tools should I use? Krsnaquli (talk) 18:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Krsnaquli: Hello and Welcome to English Wikipedia! but sorry for delay reply, firstly I'm unable to accept your mentor's invitation from due to specific personal reasons, If you interest to revert vandalism & spam from here, so, you use Special:RecentChanges to monitored Vandism & spam on here; and use these tool to revert vandalism -: Twinkle, Redwarn etc. and I saw you started revert vandalism on here but I suggest to you please carefully use these tool but do not revert Assum-Good-Faith edits and if you feel you're gain more experienced in reverted vandalism, then you able to apply here for this right but if only you made 200 or more edits in article namespace.Happy editing!😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)05:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
@Akaayu: Hello, Your draft are reviewed and rejected by other afc reviewer and they nominated your draft for speedy deletion as G11,so, I can't approve you're draft.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)17:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
@MD. Nafis Bhuiyan: Hello and I'm not a person who incubated you're article on draft, please try to improve you're article on draft space, if you think you're draft are completed then you re- move your article on draft from article namespace.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)17:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Saishna96: Hello, generally I don't review draft on request by the creator, but I'm saw the subject is releated to politicians, so, I accepted your request and It's seem to be Done.keep up this good work on Wikipedia and thank you for expanding Wikipedia from creating better article.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)15:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it is very important to correct the information on this story. Not doing so can possibly damage wikipedias reputation as a reliable source of information.
@ZD84: Hello and Welcome on Wikipedia! I didn't correctly understand you're talk, which story about you talking here and If this story releated any article are exist on enwiki,so, please mentioned here?.Cheers! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)05:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
@OrchestralHuman: Hello, When I going patrolling on new article from Special:NewPagesFeed and I saw you're article and I've examin and {{Unreliable source}} template added on you're article. Source number #1 & #3 are seems to unreliable then I've tagged for improve you're article.If you're remove unreliable source on this article then you able to remove this template.Happy editing.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)16:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Niddleggol: Hello, Thanks for reaching out on of my Usertalkpage and apology for delay in reply, but I don't see any notification releated to formatting on in you're mentioned draft.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)05:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kuyhaacracks1812: Hello, Welcome on Wikipedia! If you don't known how to edit a page, then firstly please see H:E and You're name is seem like organization name, and it's not match to Wikipedia's Username policy, so, please request for change you're name by filling this form. Happy editing!. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)10:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rohit Bajpai 16: Hello there, sorry for delay in reply, Welcome on Wikipedia! I see you're Userpage and you're Userpage are incumbent in draft and their draft are declined and tagged for speedy deletion under G11 criteria, In Wikipedia user are not permission to create an article on self, please read Autobiography page for more information. Happy editing ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)18:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i left a note on the talk page after you noted this page for deletion. TNSF is historically significant as it was the first organization for individuals and free beach goers and was paramount in establishing the right for social nudity to be practiced in the United States. Jdnunn (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PQR01: Hello, Thank you for reaching out on my usertalkpage but I generally do not review draft on request by the author, but due to different concerns I've tagged you're draft as Marked submission is under review, I given to take a time to look on them, I'm currently studying in university and my lecture is going on...Happy editing! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)06:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PQR01: Hi again, sorry for delay in reviewing you're article and thanks for patience, I've accepted you're draft and you're known you're created article are notable under WP:NBIO, so, I've go ahead to accepted. Happy editing!~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)14:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Aviram7, thank you for reviewing the first submission of this page Draft:Supervisory Technologies (SupTech). I re-edited the content, I hope this addresses your feedback. Please let me know if there is any additional edit I need to make. Thank you!
@Ludicastri: Hi and Thanks for reaching out on my usertalkpage; I don't think you're draft are rewritten by you and rectified them, but in this time I have no extra time to re-review but you're is seems to be like WP:EPSTYLE, I suggest to you please rewritten this draft submission.
and you're draft are not rewritten as Wikipedia encyclopedia tones, I you're draft are not ready for re-review.Happy editing!~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)04:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Youknowwhoistheman: Hello, Thank you for reaching out on my usertalkpage, of course!I'm good and I see you're draft submission are in pending or waiting for reviewer for review, but unfortunately you're draft are not written like encyclopedia tones and it's not meet to manual of styles of editing of Wikipedias policy.you're draft are provide unsufficient content and it appears the subject of your draft is unknown. I suggest to please see any other indian politicians article to known How to written a article releated to Indian politicians so, I'm not going to accept or decline you're submission, If you ready to re-written this article, then I happy to accept you're draft, or if you fix you're draft current issues. after you complete this draft then you feel free to ping me, Happy editing!~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)13:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Aviram7, I hope you are having a good day. I noticed you tagged Christian Diego Di Sanzo with maintenance tags just eight minutes after it was created. Could you consider waiting for an hour before reviewing or tagging any article? This gives the creator some time to improve it. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DreamRimmer: Hello, I'm good and I hadn't really thought about it during patrolling new pages and apology for that ;next time I will gives creators some time imporve her article, thank you for given feedback of my work at NPP. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)04:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done next time if you request reviewing me you're draft then I decline you're request for review for you're draft because I think you need to create account for editing on Wikipedia with username and no need to request from ip for request for reviewing. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)17:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Aviram7, I hope you are doing well. As part of the May backlog drive, you marked the Sher Singh Kadyan article as reviewed, but it appears that some issues were overlooked. Unsourced statements were not removed, and grammar issues were not addressed. Additionally, there were discrepancies between the information provided in the lead and that found in the sections. Could you please explain why these issues were not addressed during your review? – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DreamRimmer: Hi there, thank you for informing me on about that, during patrolling on newly article, I addressed an problem in my phone is releating to phone hanging probelm and If I see any mistake in articles then I try to fix or rectify them, so, sorry but I was unable to do for try recall incidentally those issues for this time who you are mention in you're message, but I promise next time, before marking the page, I'be try to fix them and then marking as reviewed.😎 ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє]16:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BusterD: Hello, Thank you for informing about that,and I apology for about that..I think this my mistake but I was forget to reverted those edits on there and never try to seem them back.Happy editing!ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє]01:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really too much of a beginner, but I hope you can teach me how to make citations and references, because I don't want my edits to be deleted because I didn't have any cites or references. So please help me out! That's all I need to do to become very good. I already know the distinguish and about, and bold and italics, and how to make a page, and more. All I need now how to make citations and references. Thank you! --Fahad Ahmed Alanzi (talk) 07:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @Fahad Ahmed Alanzi Hi there, I trust you're doing well. This is not Aviram7 but one of his talk page watchers. I understand you are using a newly created account and that's fine. Citing sources is an important part of English Wikipedia, especially when writing articles. You can read more about that at this page. But if you're so new and that page seems too long, you could check out this shorter page that summarises the important parts of citing sources. Whenever you think you have learnt the basics you might consider taking this quiz to test your understanding, don't worry, it is not going to be marked like an exam :). Regards and happy editing, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanderwaalforces: Hi there, thank you for response on my usertalkpage as (Talkpage stalker) and @Fahad Ahmed Alanzi: HAY, Sorry for late reply but When you sent me massage for about that I was in University for studying but I hope Vanderwaalforces reply is proven helpful for you.Happy editing!ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє]13:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
@Vanderwaalforces: Hi there, sorry for late response to you due to I involving in other work on Wikipedia and I was not able to fix this problems due to refill Website not worked properly but now I fixed this probelm; thank you for sent me this message for informing me about this probelm.Happy editing --- Infínítybσy7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє)15:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou. I have one doubt, I seen this Kesineni Sivanath is created yesterday which is his orginal name. but most of the articles are in Kesineni Chinni so i created with the common name. so what should to do? can you redirect kesineni sivanath into kesineni chinni which is his common name and most of the article are in his common name only. TastyMall (talk) 08:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! You known cites and reference are both are same, If you like who create (cite or refs), so, I teaching you -[1]If you like to see more templates releated to cite, please see - cite web,cite journal, cite news.etc I hope you now you understand how to make cite or refs on Wikipedia. Happy editing --- Infínítybσy7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє)11:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This award is given in recognition to Aviram7 for accumulating at least 100 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This award is given in recognition to Aviram7 for accumulating at least 15 points during each week of the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PQR01: Hi there, Done I've marked you're article as reviewed and thank you creating this article and also thanks for given opportunity for reviewing you're article by request on here. Happy editing --- Infínítybσy7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє)05:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Can you tell me where can I see the list of those websites which we can't use as reference in Wikipedia, I mean those websites which are not included in reliable sources. PQR01 (talk) 05:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PQR01: Hi there,apology but I really don't known about that but you can try to use this javascript for knowing which references are reliable or not ;I hope this js is helping you to known about references reliable or unreliable. Happy editing --- Infínítybσy7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє)06:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, If you are free, can you please review this article? I did not create this AfC but I have made a lot of improvements to it after it was declined which you can see. Thanks ~~ PQR01 (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PQR01:,oh no, I was watching YouTube Videos, I saw you're draft The subject is not currently not passing WP:NBIO and so, He is not notable,they do not archiving any significant awards in (Trading or in Marketing field), and his father is Indian billionaire,and he is the CEO of his father's company, so this does not proven that the this person is notable in anyway.;so, other afc reviewers are declined 2 times this draft after you're improvement.
Hello, Aviram7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. HS Anasuya Kulkarni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.