Can you please prevent this article from getting deleted? It's an article, and a link can be found here (official site):Here --Willy, your mate 07:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Have a nice day! 156.34.142.110 12:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you can pop into IRC I have an issue you would probably be able to help with. Ariel♥Gold 12:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, first of all congrats for your RfA :). I hope you enjoy the mop. I'm contacting you as I ses you spend quite some time reverting vandalism, and I was just curious on which too you were using for that? You're often faster than I am so I am puzzled ;). -- lucasbfr talk 13:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User editing from IP 64.88.89.3 is vandalising again. I suggest blocking him for a longer period of time because of multiple vandalisms and blocks. McMonster 14:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for attending to the block on NigPig123. Most vandalism is routine clean-up for me, but I find racist garbage much harder to stomach. I hate to think of people being confronted with that kind of nastiness while researching school projects or just innocently reading Wikipedia. Moonriddengirl 15:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, what I did to the article on MechWarrior 4 Vengeance was not vandalism. It is simply updating it, SINCE Microsoft did quit hosting for it's multiplayer. Direct-IP connection is the ONLY way to play Multiplayer. So tell me, how is the truth vandalism :)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.86.11.229 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For mopping up vandalism all over the pixels! --Hirohisat Talk 18:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] |
DerHexer..! I am on vandal patrol as well and you keep beating me to the revert button..! You're too fast.. Great job sir..! Ukulele 21:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you so very much for reverting the vandalism to my userpage, and for your tireless reverting of many other cases of vandalism as well (you keep beating me :P ). -- Gravitan(Talk | Contribs) 22:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] |
Greetings sir... I appreciate your help with 12.110.35.99 yesterday; I wanted to point out that this particular user has apparently retaliated for his 24-hour suspension by deleting a large part of KESQ-TV AND KTNV-TV and repeated his vanity statement on KMIR-TV (turns out he is one of those 4 people mentioned, namely the 3rd one). I have ID's his IP with 'sharedIP'... but at this point, I would personally move for a 'softblock'. If I should bring this to another forum, please advise. Uf wiederluege! Cactus165 03:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I proposto Frog for featured articles!I can do it? --A cool night green owl 11:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my userpage and blocking the user. Much appreciated. - Boy1jhn 15:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting my user page! Gscshoyru 19:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I go on the recent changes list, and literally half of the edits on it are made by you, reverting vandalism. Keep up the good work! --Diniz (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] |
First, could you slow down n the vandal fighting please! (just joking!!!!)
OK, the real thing i want to ask is : you are an admin, right? so can you process some more people to be asble to use NPW please? Cheers! ACBestAutograph Book 21:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the revert. That user leaves that message just after joining the wikiproject I run, interesting stuff..... what do you think of that? SGGH speak! 22:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
maybe u didnt see the pile of junk that comprised the david ireland page before i did blank it. i was simply deleting that heap of bullshit which was so clearly vandalized and edited. instead of wasting my time trying to re-write the whole page (since i know nothing about david ireland anyways), i simply deleted the lifestory of wutever loser edited it last, since thats all it wus: a useless page with absolutely nuthing to do with david ireland as it was.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.59.169 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 08:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
{{delete|reason}}
into the article. Furthermore, please sign your postings and don't remove warnings. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]Hey i just made my user page and i realised that my link to tranmere rovers F.C linked to the wrong place so i went back to change it and the whole thing had been delited please tel me why :s —Preceding unsigned comment added by Curttrfc (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 09:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to say Hi, since I always seem to bump into you when reverting vandalism (and often leaving a duplicate warning on a userpage just after you've done the same!) Keep up the good work! Brianga 10:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Curttrfc has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Why is it that the article Potter's House Christian Fellowship is allowed to be hijacked and have ALL links deleted with the approval of Admin and yet if I do the same on the AOG page it is not only instantly reverted but I am warned? I think there is a double standard here. Only a month ago the Potter's House page had many links to other churches in various nations, and yet now it is reduced to only negative opinions. Religious discrimination? 124.184.131.250 13:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like this page is being vandalized by multiple ips from the same network/person-- the first 3 numbers are the same, but the last one keeps changing. Can you ban the whole range, maybe? Or protect the page? Thanks! Gscshoyru 14:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DH. I put a "db-band" tag on the former article for Grant Lyman and posted the standard notification on the creator's talk page. I saw another edit on the page which turned out to be the "hangon" tag put on by the creator. I was in the process of replying to their concerns on the GL talk page when my submit failed due to the pages being deleted (by you according to the log; that's why I'm here).
Now as it stood the article was speediable IMO, but since the proper hangon procedure was used, shouldn't there have been a wait to see if the article could be improved? Did you ever see the hangon tag? Or perhaps the creator's statements on the articles Talk demonstrated they did not understand notability/sourcing guidelines and better to just start from scratch, hangon or not?
Thanks for clarifying this for me—deletion policy seems to be an ever evolving thing. Good editing, Baccyak4H (Yak!) 15:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Because when I grow up, I want to revert vandalism like you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 16:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] |
When you go on Recent changes patrolling do you use a program such as vandal fighter then perform the reverts/warnings/blocks using TW as thats what I tend to do and you often beat me there, just wondering. Best regards. Ds.mt 17:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:Petrificustotalus has removed all the spells without a known incantation from the Spells in Harry Potter, arguing that because they have no incantation and are therefore not spells. I totally disagree, and have attempted to talk to him but he does not respond or listen. I've reverted thrice, and so I can't do it again. I have no idea what to do about this, where I post asking for help, so I'm asking you for what the best course of action here is. Thanks! Gscshoyru 18:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By reverting the vandalism on my User page and talk page. Are you an admin? because this user seem to be continuing to vandalize both pages. Simon Bar Sinister 20:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Rolling Stone page is under attack again. I added the section about their website, and now probably some of the same vandals that attacked the website's forum have been vandalizing this section repeatedly. How can they be banned or the page semi-protected? Thanks. 82Martin 20:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged 202.151.193.4 as a Komodo lover sockpuppet as the anon vandalised User:Dora Nichov's userpage and talk page. It belongs to the same company as all the other Komodo lover IPs. Also like the other IPs, it is located in Malaysia (if you check out User:Black Rhino Ranger's userpage, the sock admits that he/she lives in Malaysia). The IP edited some of the articles Komodo lover socks edit. Pants(T) 20:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop reverting my edits. This is ACBest, just not logged in. See my IP talk page, and my IP history, and you will see that this IS me. 86.8.101.232 21:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out I may not be moving for about 3/4 weeks (see edit description on [1]!!ACBest 21:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How do you get them so quick? I'm constantly refreshing the page, spot something - but you'll have already got there reverted it plus given them a warning in 10 seconds or something
3tmx 22:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One word: Twinkle. It's a special JavaSript add-on for Wikipedia Mister2nothing 22:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cool 3tmx 15:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday (American Central TIme), I was refreshing on Recent changes, and I caught someone making something called (omitted because it demotes the "wiki-tag" name) and said administrators do it all the time. I cannot find it's name in the search though, or even the user's name which I remember from recent changes. well, at least some of it...
How is this an inappropriate username? Picaroon (t) 23:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, could you check this article ? I thought lyrics was under copyright. Thanks in advance. --24.199.100.61 11:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Rolling Stone magazine article is still being attacked by one or more vandals. Now, one has registered and is vandalizing under the name Nsclique. They repeatedly attack the section about the website, and are probably the same trolls that likely brought down the RS website mesage board forum. Can anything be done? Thanks, 82Martin 13:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user requests unblocking as they do not believe the username is against policy. I'm struggling to see this myself. Would you mind leaving some comments on the user's talk page to help with the unblock review. Thanks Spartaz Humbug! 18:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you accuse me of vandalisim without even explaining to me on the talk page? That just shows ignorance and imaturity. I was editing it because this article isnt entirly accurate and does not support a worldwide view. First of all Class Presidents and Student Body Presidents are one in the same. Class Presidents in some areas are people who lead their Gradurating Class. Class Presidents lead students and I was just fixing the imperfections in the article. and with the Article Tottilia I was fixing the imperfections in the article. You need to remember that most teachers and professors don't believe in Wikipedia and dont recommened their students using it. You also need to also consider that most pof the articles are edited be people who have no credtials. Something you probally don't have. Do you have the creditionals to edit and work on encyclopedias and other such works? I think not..Not explaing your edits and blockage from editing wikipedia shows extreme imaturity. Thank you for reading my opinions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.160.33 (talk • contribs)
Löschst du den Redirect User:Marcus Cyron/List of Roman Consuls mal bitte? Danke. :) Marcus Cyron 15:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping out on the ESEA article.
The people vandalizing it hang out in #piratecity on GameSurge, apparently.
They troll/teamkill on scrims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ICAPTCHA (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cool-dude tim is now requesting an unblock on his talk page. If he's really a reincarnation of a previous Simpsons vandal, then I have no objection to the block, but if he's an eleven year old kid (as he claims), then perhaps we should treat this with more kid gloves.--Chaser - T 18:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DerHexer. Do you happen to know what is planned for Final Fantasy (band), which was deleted to make way for a "non-controversial page move"? No move has happened since you made the deletion several days ago. IMHO, the redirect to Owen Pallett was appropriately placed. Thanks for any illumination you can offer! --Paul Erik 19:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick catch of the vandalism on my userpage. I look up and the thing has been hit three times! Nice work. IronGargoyle 21:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WTF was that comment about? I didn't vandalise anything, I contributed a perfectly valid article. Please refrain from such unnecessarily inflammatory and meritless comments. — Timwi 23:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the person mashed up the text a bit, but I think it was a bit harsh of you to call it flat-out vandalism. All the IP did was reword (using horrendous grammar) what the original text had said. Indeed, it was a good idea to revert, but I'm just saying that putting a note on the IP's page calling it vandalism is a bit much. Pandacomics 07:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hexer, Sir, would I be guilty of some terrible conflict of interest or shortage of "good faith" if I were to infer that this youngster was related to this one and permablock them? (Course, the fool upstanding little fellow will immediately be back as somebody else, so the whole enterprise is pretty pointless.)
Well, I'm out of here to have dinner, so there's even less reason/rush to reply than there'd normally be. -- Hoary 11:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise; it wasn't vandalism - I merely made an error in placement and happen to have a suspect username (it is shared with a band that has an article here). Nancy Vandal 12:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
According to the block-log he isn't actually blocked...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gscshoyru (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 15:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. 64.8.33.176; 70.17.186.189; and 144.80.78.5 appear to be the same person, since they've been making identical nonsensical changes to The Price is Right (US game show) and/or Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego? I'm not an experienced enough Wikipedian to know how to deal with this. JTRH 00:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DerHexer, ich bin ab morgen früh für eine Woche bei den Eidgenossen. Kannst du mir bitte bis zum 16.08. meine Benutzerseite semiprotektieren? Danke & bis demnächst --Oxymoron83 17:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, kannst du bitte mal dort eingreifen? Diese(r) Dojarca versucht krampfhaft mit immer neuen fadenscheinigen Argumenten "Imperator" als Pränomen durchzusetzen. Marcus Cyron 19:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
204.9.212.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) received a final warning 5 days ago, which I don't think merits a block for what's clearly a test edit. I know it's only a 7 hour block, but an inappropriate AIV report needn't result in a block. A {{test1}} would be more appropriate, IMO. I'll contact Targeman (talk · contribs) about better reports, too. — Scientizzle 19:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cause you already got more than twice as many edits this month as I do.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 08:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DerHexer, I see you blocked the above username for having an inappropriate username. It doesn't seem to be against policy in my eyes and there's a discussion that's just been started on WP:RFCN - any objections to an unblock? RyanPostlethwaite 17:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
The Wiki Wiffle Bat | |
In light of the new home run record being set, keep on smacking those vandals and their edits out of here! BrokenSphere 20:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] |
You have protected this page just 3 minuted after the other editor made his controversial edit. Please unprotect the page otherwise I have to complain to another administrator. As you can read German you can see that the issue is already addressed in German Wikipedia [2] --Dojarca 14:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted this article as CSD A7, yet there was a claim of notability in the article (a reference to a magazine feature about the person), therefore I do not feel it qualifies under the criteria for speedy deletion. --Darksun 21:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You recently blocked 71.187.35.239 for a period of 24 hours. While multiple users may be affected, it has a history of returning to vandalism within minutes of blocks as long as a week expiring, possibly a longer block is worth it at this point? I was about to block for another 10 days or something until I saw your block. GoodnightmushTalk 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AFUSCO has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I put up that tag and it works. Does that mean I am an admin? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stupid2 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 09:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Check the pages now and my reply on my talk page - I think an apology is in order..... :-)
Thanks in advance
Dreamer.se 10:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)dreamer.se[reply]
OK. So can it be regarded as vandalism and am I at risk of being blocked? Yes or no? I just want to know in the future. Dreamer.se 11:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)dreamer.se[reply]
Have I? A lot? Just exactly what content have I removed? Just curious. Dreamer.se 11:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)dreamer.se[reply]
As I told you, that information can now be found on pages Christmas With Boney M. (1984) and Christmas Album (Boney M. album), nothing has been removed. But thanks for the tip - I'll keep this experience in mind in the future.
Best of luck with everything.
Over and out.
Dreamer.se 11:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)dreamer.se[reply]
Cheers for nabbing this guy mate: 220.237.2.83. Ryan4314 13:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage.Thedjatclubrock :) (talk)
Thedjatclubrock :) (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hello, DerHexer! When I revert vandalism, can you let me warn the user? Sometimes I may get confused and warn the vandal after you have. Thanks! :) --Isis4563(talk) 17:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
YAY! <3 Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Family Force 5 artcle. <3 - User:SuperDMChan
How can I get this page deleted? (the utzchips page) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.225.195 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
mam, please help me. I am new to wikipedia. How can i get the utzxhip page removed?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.225.195 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya stranger, I have a quick question if you have a sec. Ariel♥Gold 21:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are lyrics to folk songs such as Green Bushes appropriate for Wikipedia? -WarthogDemon 21:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously... from a former admin, avid vandal fighter, process patroller and avid contributor...
This place will ultimately disappoint you. Channel your creative and mental processes elsewhere. You will look back one day on the effort you put into this project and regret it. I 100% guarantee it; even if you think I'm a madman at the moment, you'll get it one day.
This is not vandalism, or even a stringent demand, just a friendly bit of advice, albeit from someone whose drunken state is a prerequisite to slumming around the talk and user space of this project. Feel free to ignore it. Peace. 154.20.36.54 09:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for deleting those unnecessary redirects. -- 200.234.61.150 11:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you care to explain to me why you are deleting thousands of redirects? and in what way are they not unnecessary? The sunder king 12:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there DerHexer. Don't know if you remember me or not but I'm The Random Editor. Just wanted to let you know that since you are one of are big time vandal fighters. You might be interested at the discussion going on at WT:CVU. Just thought I would inform you. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems you forgot to push the block button on the Airbrush vandal. I went ahead and did it myself and left a block message with my signature.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just curious, but why did you warn him even though I made the revert? Cheers, JetLover (talk) 21:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I still do RCP the old school way and haven't yet settled on which of the tools to use. I'd like something portable that can be used on IE and Firefox, and on different computers if possible. Any suggestions? Thanks. BrokenSphereMsg me 22:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for reverting the vandalism made by an unknown user on harry's page.Lil'Khan 22:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pleace, because of lot of anonimous users vandalizing the article it needs to be semiprotected!
Please, the article needs to be only semiprotected against annonimous provocators. At the moment they have vandalized it! They will comment anything! Please correct it: Allied Powers (communist): Macedonian Partisans Macedonian National Liberation Army Serbian, Aromanian and Bulgarian collaborators - this is nonsence!
as follows:
Allied Powers (communist): Partisans (Yugoslavia) Macedonian National Liberation Army Jingby 13:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, aber lesen Sie bitte den Artikel Macedonism!Dann werden Sie die Frage verstehen! Jingby 14:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please, these anonimous users are vandalizing this article too!
Lieber Herr Hexer, bitte machen Sie etwas gegen diesen Vandals! Jingby 13:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
With the help of ethnic Macedonian minorities in Bulgaria, several pro-Bulgarian and anti-Greek armed detachments (Ohrana) were organized !!! Absolut nonsence! It have to by - With the help of Macedonian emigrants in Bulgaria, several pro-Bulgarian and anti-Greek armed detachments (Ohrana) were organized. This is unbeliveble!!!Jingby 13:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I seen your reply days ago; I just didn't reply back that's all. Nevermind though. Happy editing. :). The sunder king 19:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, and thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page!--Diniz (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you delete this talk page? I mean, the redirect makes sense, and it doesn't hurt, right? I don't see a CSD criterion that applies in this case. Melsaran 17:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick reverts. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks from me, too :-) Stephenb (Talk) 13:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The revert was much appreciated. Plasticup T/C
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, I didn't see it till now! --Hasek is the best 14:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for catching that vandalism on my user page (it was inaccurate too; I don't like small dogs :P). I noticed he's got himself blocked now... all the best! EyeSereneTALK 20:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DerHexer, you have previously warned User: 193.120.116.179 about vandalism, but did not see it as it had been erased. A block is therefore in order, since your previous warning was a "final warning" too.--Loodog 20:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(reffered to you through Indonesian edit) Is their any quick wikipedia edit key you have to type (ü) that you know of, Danke Unbekümmert 21:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, are you in germany right now, I'm in Bremerhaven right now. Unbekümmert 21:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
oh, I can understand germany and speak it, but I use a american macbook, so the keys are in english so it is hard to type. if you know bremerhaven I live in the columbus center, I get great views of the sail every five years so no complaints. I thought I would be the only person in Germany who edits the english wikipedia. I hope if you don't mind if ask for your help now and then, I just made a wikipedia profile.It is great to know I am not the only one. Gute Nacht, Unbekümmert 21:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ich werde machen geschäft mit Ihnen dann... es ist zu spät für dies, Gute Nacht, Unbekümmert 21:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist hart, die Tasten für Tippen zu finden, it is easier to type in normal englishUnbekümmert 21:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for removing vandalism to my talk page. :) --Kyoko 23:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thanx but she is my best friend umm and i has permission. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.107.234.229 (talk) 02:02:36, August 18, 2007 (UTC)
No, I don't think so, Wikipedia is an open site. I have much as right to contribute to the Soprano Crime Family site as you. So, you're just going to have to accept it...
User:138.89.66.22 is continuing to vandalize Tha Realest. I am informing you because you have blocked him several times before. Regards. 203.59.118.146 13:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Waacstats 14:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DerHexer, I just wanted to say thank you for my successful RfA, which passed 89/2/5. I was pleasantly surprised at the amount of support that I received and I am more than a little bit humbled at the kind words yourself and many others had to say about me. I wanted to personally say how much it is appreciated. I enjoy working with you and am looking forward to more of it in the future! Trusilver 16:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I hope you'll use my script. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my User page! I didnt realize that it had even been vandalized until today! hehe :) Keep up the awesome work! ✬Dillard421✬ (talk • contribs) 07:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
oh baby baby how was i supposed to know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.11.1 (talk) 04:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[7] Welcome Back!!! Ariel♥Gold 22:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. And it's good to have you back :D Gscshoyru 11:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello DerHexer! Please delete my user page, user talk page and sub-pages. Thank you RS2007 11:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Hexer :) Entschuldige, dass ich auf Deutsch schreibe (das fällt mir doch leichter als das Englische). Könntest Du Dir einmal die Edits von User:83.181.92.90 auf meiner Diskussionsseite anschauen? Ich werd daraus nicht ganz schlau. Nach seinem ersten Edit war plötzlich mein ganzer Bildschirm schwarz. Seine Antwort ist auch nicht besonders nett ausgefallen .. vielen Dank, --Katzenfisch 15:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage. :D AngelOfSadness talk 16:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]