Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Thank you Adrian for the welcome. I hope that I be able to manage in writing and shall contribute to the community of Wikipedia. I also hope that I will have help when get stuck.Despotović (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because I have no experience in working on Wikipedia, I must ask you biginner question - what content is placed on User page? And when I am already here, I must ask you something else. Would be of interest to write a series of articles about artists who were agents of change eighties art in Serbia known as New Image Painting. These would be the only authors who today, like Milovan Destil Markovic, lives across Europe: Slobodan Trajkovic (London), Tahir Lusic and Nada Alavanja (Dusseldorf), Mrdjan Bajic and Jarmila Vesovic (Paris), Tafil Musovic (Amsterdam) and so on.Despotović (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoidorexercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 22:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
familiar with them, their biographies and their art, and this falls under 'affiliated', ie. CIO. When I writing an encyclopedic article, then there are no amount of critical evaluation (which may be perceived not to represent a 'neutral point of view') but when the amount of their biographical and bibliographical facts, then, in my opinion, there are under the 'neutral point of view '. Also, when we comes to the article about me, for which you kindly has entered this warning, for example, just me in Belgrade and even in Serbia have a catalogue of the Biennial in Sao Paulo. I think it is understandable that only I can enter in the text necessary data for the quality and reliability of the text. It is also in the rest of the case in most of the entries that I have done. The text is set by one of my colleagues (whether it is also 'conflict of interest'?), arranged in parts of my colleagues from San Francisco to London and Berlin, will even include one of my acquaintances from Dushanbe (Tajikistan). Whether their participations also be "in conflict of interest '?. I apologize for the length, but I need clarification of my future writing articles for Wikipedia. Thank you very much .--Despotović (talk) 15:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have created a new article - Slobodanka Stupar. Would you like some suggestions - criticism? Answer here on your talk page. GroveGuy (talk) 04:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been tagged with OneSource. You need more citations. The audience needs to know where everything on the page came from. I look at the Despotovic page and it has sources. You need to do the same thing for Stupar. I like the Paul Klee article. How about using infobox artist? GroveGuy (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What do you want to know about photographs? I see your additions of infobox artist. GroveGuy (talk) 02:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has noticed that some new editors quit after a few weeks because it is not easy creating new pages. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Guides/New_pages They encourage older editors to help beginners who have started new articles. That's why I was helping you. If you need help or have any questions in the future, please contact me. GroveGuy (talk) 06:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like this reference for Lubarda: http://thearthistoryjournal.blogspot.com/2011/02/petar-lubarda.html The two you put in don't work for me. To see the Grove Dictionary of Art you have to pay to have a subscription. Not good. GroveGuy (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]