This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
ICHTHUS |
January 2020 |
The Top 3 Articles
The Top 3 most-popular articles about PeopleinWikiProject Christianity were:
Did You Know?
Nominated by StalinsunnykvjFeatured article
A Song for Simeon, is a 37-line poem written in 1928 by American-English poet T. S. Eliot (1888–1965). It is one of five poems that Eliot contributed to the Ariel poems series of 38 pamphlets by several authors published by Faber and Gwyer. "A Song for Simeon" was the sixteenth in the series and included an illustration by avant garde artist Edward McKnight Kauffer. The poem's narrative echoes the text of the Nunc dimittis, a liturgical prayer for Compline from the Gospel passage. Eliot introduces literary allusions to earlier writers Lancelot Andrewes, Dante Alighieri and St. John of the Cross. Critics have debated whether Eliot's depiction of Simeon is a negative portrayal of a Jewish figure and evidence of anti-Semitism on Eliot's part.
(more...)
Bible Verse
“ | May He grant you according to your heart’s desire, And fulfill all your purpose. | ” |
Psalm 20:4 New King James Version (NKJV)
Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.
Quotes
"Faith lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the criticism coming from society, from politics, from history, for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in doubt, which drives a wedge into the world of false assurances."
~ Jacques Ellul
Can we talk about Syriac language here? Swedish.historian (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Elizium23. Thank you for the info on Wikipedia verifiability. The page on Palayoor contains information that reads as "...threw a handful of water up into the sky. After reaching a particular height the water stood still in the air, the particles glittering like diamonds". This information has been stated without any citation. Does it qualify as a verified statement? If such statements are allowed to remain on Wikipedia unverified, won't anyone be able to write anything they wanted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navinwiki (talk • contribs) 15:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
It's also mentioned under the Thaliyakulam heading on the same page. Nothing else; thank you. This story of throwing water in the air was taught to me too during childhood, but nobody seems to be able to verify it. Perhaps there could be records in Kerala, of the apostle's work when he was there. Navinwiki (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
wrt [1]: Baling wire is called that because you use it to make bales of hay. But a metal handle is a "bail": see wikt:bail#Etymology_3. —Steve Summit (talk) 20:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Freedom of speech is our first right under the Constitution. You have NO right to suppress it. 81.146.44.15 (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
The source, Quillette, was deleted. I have asked the editor who deleted it about it. Doug Weller talk 06:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Elizium23! My responses at: Talk:Royal and Venerable Confraternity of the Most Blessed Sacrament of Mafra. Creo que su conocimiento del idioma español puede ayudarnos. Thanks.--Yup12 (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your response [2] to my problem at the Computing Ref. desk. I tested the VGA connector, cable and monitor on a different PC. I have since replaced the video card but the fault remains! DroneB (talk) 22:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I do not see why the image was so bad that it deserved to be removed (refering to Tempe page)?--BestOnLifeform (talk) 07:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 08:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you reverted the latest edit on List of The Hunger Games characters, would you mind explaining why you thought it was a net negative? I saw it while recent changes patrolling and it didn't seem like vandalism to me, it does look like the editor KingOreo123 did actually fix some typos. Sorry to question you, I'm just curious why you decided to revert. Thanks –NorthwestPassage talk 03:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dionysius IV of Cheppad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dionysius III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello Elizium23,
You may want to get in on this discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Miguel Romero Fernández
Roberto221 (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I thought it was okay to freely add categories without citation, please correct me if I'm wrong. The category was "Sacrifice in human fiction" because the novel depicts children being sacrificed in an annual game show. If I must cite my addition, this is my source, I suppose. Ma nam is geoffrey (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC) Oh, yes, and perhaps I might need to tell you I added the category likewise on The Hunger Games (novel) without citing. This is my citation for that edit. If you don't mind, please tell me how to cite additions to categories, I'm new to Wikipedia! Ma nam is geoffrey (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, can you give me a pointer where the merge of PerpetuatoPerpetua and Felicity was discussed? It wasn't on either talk page. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
As you know I tried to edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasting_and_abstinence_in_the_Catholic_Church, to make clear that the current USCCB page that is dedicated to fasting and abstinence rules and explanation clearly states, as it's first and main content, that the norms in the US, as I have known them to be for ~20 or more years (?), are that in the US fasting is required (or at least expected) of 18 and older and Abstinence for 14 and older. (see http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/liturgical-year/lent/catholic-information-on-lenten-fast-and-abstinence.cfm). You reverted those changes back to age 21/22 and older as it previously was. You may not have liked my choice of wording, but this needs changed and the more authoritative ages from the USCCB, which are also the commonly accepted ages all over the US, need indicated near the 21/22 ages if not completely replacing the 21/22 age rules. Whether or not some technicality in Canon Law makes 21/22 the ages OK (which is probably at least partially dubious since the USCCB specifically addresses why the norm on the fast is given as 18), you are misrepresenting the standard recommendations of the USCCB and misrepresenting the factual US Catholic practices--literally the page the section currently cites for the USCCB says 18/14, but you make it appear that it says 21/22. What's worse, when one googles "fasting and abstinence" rules for some reason google picks the 21/22 age rule lines on this page as its default answer, rather than the more authoritative USCCB page (and more commonly followed in the US) ages. Further I am curious why it obviously seems you did not agree with the above, and what "factual errors" you found in my version of the edit. NotInItaly (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi the information was totally factual, don’t know why you would say otherwise but I will add references in future :) Wikitor007 (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Nope, the show that other dude referenced may have been a joke but it was a genuine discussion about Karl really proposing the idea to directors Wikitor007 (talk) 23:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my mistake! S0091 (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Can you work your magic on this page? At this time, I can only find the Facebook announcement. Maybe you can do better.... cheers (maybe https://www.novinite.com/articles/203677/Kiril+Domuschiev+Infected+with+COVID-19) -CoronaEditor (talk) 08:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I did not know that editing the talk page comments are not allowed. Sorry for the inconvenience.Thank You for letting me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graphemaniac (talk • contribs) 16:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Do you want to explain that? Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.carloacutis.com/en/association
Carlo Acutis was blessed on feburary 21 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.62.132 (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction, I am getting it rectified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginelle2017 (talk • contribs) 08:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Though billions of people would disagree with me, it simply does not change the truth. Truth is always objective. I think you and Wikipedia believe in consensus rather than truth. It is okay since humans like you make mistakes every moment and also do not rectify it. It is all right. Water625 (talk) 05:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
No, it does not make it less true for me. It is true anyhow. Water625 (talk) 05:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For diligence around Wikipedia. Thanks! PPEMES (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2020 (UTC) |
I did explain in my wikipedia edit, that I can not find a mention in the preamble of the lateran treaty of it being expressively a "new creation". Therefore the passage seems to be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:13C0:9CB4:3128:305E:4120:8782 (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello Elizium23!
I recently saw, and appreciated very much, your edit on the page for Senator Shelley Moore Capito. I wanted to ask if you would consider reading and then providing feedback on the section "Abortion" on that page and on the Talk page. There is a disagreement about whether her "anti-abortion" position/votes should be included with her "pro-abortion rights" positions/votes because an editor does not like the language of the bill in question. I thought your knowledge of the issue and contributions were thoughtful and fair and would appreciate it if you could provide some feedback. Thank you!SeminarianJohn (talk) 08:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Say "Glaukos was most commonly used in ancient Greece to describe healthy light-colored eyes (blue, green, or light gray)"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601337/
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with Luis Miguel Romero Fernández…
"Fight the Good Fight Every Moment"
Roberto221 (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi folks, there has been a minor disaster at my home base here. There was a major fire in two apartments and they were gutted. The building is structually sound and my place is OK, no smoke/water damage, but the electricity is an issue now, and they'll be shutting it off shortly. I will be in and out, mostly out, and I'll probably wait until Easter to return. I enjoy good harsh Holy Week penances. Stay healthy, everyone, and Sts. Hananaiah, Azariah, and Mishael, pray for us! Elizium23 (talk) 18:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Elizium - you are very aggressive. Stop this ok. Act in good faith. Be clear about why you are making your edits. Expect to engage constructively when asked to. We're not having a culture war with these articles so please don't behave if the future of humanity is at stake. Thanks.Contaldo80 (talk) 02:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
[[3]] at this moment lists three (3) women biographies to be deleted. I thought we had an informal consensus to include more women in WP. I think your judgment here would be most helpful. Thanks in advance, even if you decide not to intervene. -CoronaEditor (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Elizium23, you readily admit that you are affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church, therefore, you shouldn’t be editing pages that you are doctrinally unfamiliar with. I have no intention of editing the Catholic pages(like anyone could, they’re locked). The only way you could edit the churches of Christ page is from a Catholic viewpoint, so your edits are not valid. Screw279 (talk) 03:51, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, sorry if I made problem. I didn't meant anything bad, Weird Al is of Yugoslav descent and he has Serbian and Slovenian ancestry. I just don't get it... How those references work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DZEI3101 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this. I had some copyedits started previously but got distracted the RFD nomination and didn't actually save until after your edit. If I reverted any of your changes during the edit conflict resolution process, it was unintentional. Wikiacc (¶) 19:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I have closed the DRN thread about religious honorifics and post-nominals. I don't see discussion of these edits on article talk pages or a user talk page. It appears that you are saying that an editor is introducing extra honorifics and post-nominals (extra if they are used anywhere except once to say what they are). If they are doing it in one article, discuss on that article's talk page. If they are doing it in multiple articles, discuss on their user talk page. If that is inconclusive, you can request dispute resolution. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I just saw the comments you left a few days ago at Sursticana's talk page concerning the images that the user had removed from numerous articles. I feel that this is an issue that needs to be resolved through consensus. I was wondering whether you thought that the talk page for WikiProject Catholicism would be an appropriate place to put such an RfC. I know that they usually go on the article talk pages, but that seems infeasable as there are so many. I'd also appreciate any advice you'd have on how to word it. Thanks. Display name 99 (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The AfD happened nine years ago, and I've added sources since then. If you think the article has a tone problem, that can be addressed. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 16:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I’m sorry it’s my great mistake Azmi1995 (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Mea culpa, and thanks for correcting my incorrect edit to List of saints canonized by Pope Francis. Truthanado (talk) 20:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Elizium23, for your patience and friendly reaction to my mistake. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC) |
I have moved this discussion to where it belongs at Talk:John Allen Chau. Please remember to sign your posts in the future. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I a newbie here on Wikipedia. May I know why some texts were removed from this article discussion page..?? ItWiki97 (talk) 04:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
On my talk you talked on it under April 2020 but constitutes the time of when you posted your comment it was May by Wikipedia authorized Time (UTC). So, I would appreciate if you could next time add something to a May 2020 section because common it’s May on my April area you don’t know what kind slack they’ll give me for that. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion reviewofAmerican Catholic Church in the United States. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TimOliv (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm sure you get lots of these, but I am inviting you to review a page I have just redone: History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance. I am hoping to take it to GA, but I want other eyes on it before I do. I am still a relatively new editor. I think it's good--but then, what do I actually know about what qualifies as good in Wikipedia? Not much--so I'm hoping you do and that you're willing to share your wisdom. Please give it a quicklook, if you are willing, and comment, criticize and edit as you will! Thank you so much! Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Why did you Change the Syriac Name of Syro Malabar Catholic Church...It is the Official language of Church..Syro Malabar Catholic Church is Part of 23 Eastern Catholic Church ...So Add the Syriac title Back. please Add it please..Or We will Take the Actions Legally... Syriac language is Part of Our Heritage..You have no Claim to Erase it. If you are not. . Please Change its name to Syriac Also.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:1E73:FB32:CFD8:746B:CC70:1F9C (talk) 08:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add its Syriac name and Malayalam name like this The Syro-Malabar Catholic Church (Classical Syriac: ܥܸܕܬܵܐ ܩܵܬܘܿܠܝܼܩܝܼ ܕܡܲܠܲܒܵܪ ܣܘܼܪܝܵܝܵܐ Edta Qatholiqi D'Malabar Suryaya; Malayalam: മലബാറിലെ സുറിയാനി കത്തോലിക്ക സഭ '
Mar Yohanan (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
You cited that as justification for removing the religious orders in the table. However, it does say (granted, at the very end of that section) that "[p]ost-nominals should not be added except … when the post-nominals themselves are under discussion in the material."
That's the case with the archbishops of Vancouver list. I do indeed mention how "four were members of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate (OMI), and one (Dontenwill) became the superior general of the order". I also mention how McNeil was "the first archbishop who did not belong to a religious order". So for the sake of consistency, all archbishops who belonged to religious orders need to have their post-nominals listed – it wouldn't make much sense for me to only mention those belonging to the OMI. —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
why did you revert my edit @ Catholic Church ? Rantemario (talk) 02:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thanks for fact-checking the controversy section of the Marist Brothers. Allenjambalaya (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC) |
Is there an MOS rule against including succession boxes for auxiliary bishops? If not, I think it's useful to include one because it shows who last held the title, who concurrently served as auxiliary, and who holds the title next. In some dioceses (like Birmingham in Great Britain this past March and Milan in April), the resignation of an auxiliary bishop is accepted when another auxiliary is appointed. Hence, it could be said that they are "succeeding" to that post. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
"Consensus cannot always be assumed simply because editors stop responding to talk page discussions in which they have already participated.". And remember, silence does not imply consent when drafting new policies. —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
May be an idea to specify that ? If someone is interested to do so. Not an excuse, i would have still made the mistake probably. Hmm, resist urge of seemingly obvious mistake corrections, look twice first, if i do this a next time (and if i remember). Thanks for the setting straight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G Wijnsma (talk • contribs) 22:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm somewhat reluctant to post directly on your talk page and so will do so very carefully. But you have not responded to my concerns on the talk page of Rafael Guízar y Valencia. It is not evident to me that you followed the correct procedures when you flagged some of the text as violating copyright. If you do not specify at the time where the copyright concern lies then it is very hard for other editors to (a) verify that you are correct, and (b) take action to improve the article while avoiding text that is subject to copyright. I raised a similar concern on another article where this happened. If you have indeed followed the correct procedure then it's good to know and I thank you very much for doing that, but it's critical to ensure transparency. Contaldo80 (talk) 03:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Honestly, this is the place to be. All the best! ——Serial # 16:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Before you post about it in another forum, I'm confused what the point of your post was, anyway. Your user page lists the very thing he commented about. No Googling is required. Unless I'm missing something (and if I am, no need to out yourself showing me what I missed). Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello Elizium23. Please see WP:AN3#User:Dbrodbeck reported by User:Permareperwiki1664 (Result: ). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Elizium23. You have new messages at Talk:Kelly Clarkson.
Message added Chihciboy (talk) 02:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yes. It is now redundant. Basilicas in the Catholic Church contains all the material that it contained and eliminated a lot of Italo-English bad grammar. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
I am quite surprised at how you have handled my potential COI, and that you presume bad faith on my part.
You press severe charges on me leaving me without any way of defending myself although I have been as transparent as I can. I would invite you to point out specific promotion, non-neutrality, advertising or any other form of misconduct from my part because, as I already said, I am only interested in contributing to the historical facts about the topics I am interested in. --Kaklen (talk) 10:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
I added the proper information. I have contacts within that diocese. The vicar general is Msgr. Michael Jamail and the Bishop-Elect is Msgr. David L. Toups. The latter, I suppose, is national news, though. The biggest candy master (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I am very well aware of that. However, by definition, a sede vacante diocese has no bishop (think the Archdiocese of Anchorage, who's archbishop got transferred to Seattle, leaving his seat vacant), whereas this diocese has a Vicar General, Bishop-Elect and a Bishop Emeritus/Apostolic Admin. The biggest candy master (talk) 14:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
That comment was addressed to Elizium23 The biggest candy master (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Elizium23, if you are going to persist, then do not delete the following information: the Bishop of Beaumont is Curtis Guillory, until June 9th. After that date the Pope appointed him APOSTOLIC ADMIN. The biggest candy master (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
To all those trying to blindside me: §2. When the function of the diocesan bishop is suspended, the power of a vicar general and an episcopal vicar is suspended. Canon 481. This states that their power is suspended, but not their office. Therefore, the Monsignor Michael Jamail remains Vicar General (at least in name) until another is appointed. I am hereby dropping this matter. Just thought I'd share this with the 3+ Wiki editors telling me I'm wrong. The biggest candy master (talk) 00:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
I see you have done work on the relevant page. For years the coat of arms of Fr. Zuhlsdorf has been inaccurate. I tried to change it today, but I don't know how. His arms are on his blog page. I upload a file. I don't know how to make the change. Perhaps you would be so kind, since you have expertise. Also, you said that citations were needed for Fr. Zuhlsdorf's diaconal ordination. He wrote on his blog that he was ordained by Card. Mayer on the Feast of the Sacred Heart in 1990 in the Basilica of San Nicola in Carcere. https://wdtprs.com/2011/05/paul-augustin-card-mayer-osb-100-years-r-i-p/ Again, you seem to know how to do these things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vigilans1571 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Elizium23. I don't want to stoke up the fire on the talk page, but to be accurate MrOllie reverted at 19:35 on 17 June 2020, 03:48 on 18 June 2020 and 16:51 on 18 June 2020 which is three times in a 24 hour period. Félix An has reverted twice so far. That's why I warned about the period. Let's just hope that they heed the warning at stop it, which is by far the most important thing. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Where is your edit war warning at the other user's page? ɱ (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Your own revert should count too, where's your contribution to the talk page discussion?!? You and them are just ganging up with reverts to push your idea, without any supplemental references. ɱ (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Like let's not be confused here between 3RR and edit warring. You both are pushing your bold opinions repeatedly without/while taking it to talk, I should really be edit war-warning you both! ɱ (talk) 20:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, i reverted your 2 edits. You applied MOS:IS for wrong country. MOS:IS doesn’t apply for Bangladesh related articles. From MOS:IS:
This avoidance of Indic scripts only applies to articles that are predominantly India-related and is excluded from, among others, articles about Hinduism, Buddhism, Pakistan or any of India's neighbouring countries.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
I got it from [[4]] and check through all I added and each said Nontrinatarian and which groups they split from and etc. Apha9 (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apha9 (talk • contribs)
I don't know how to citate on Wikipedia so if you have the time maybe you could edit up the extra groups for Nontrinitarian Groups some point.Apha9 (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
HiElizium23! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
I did not realize that presuming the ethnicity (Irish) of people with Irish surnames like Casey, Carroll, Kenny, Malone, etc. was a violation of Wikipedia rules. I presume that cases where the individual was born in Ireland, or his or her parents are identified as Irish immigrants to the USA qualify. 2604:2000:EFC0:12:7922:1B66:98F2:E6E1 (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
The reference you've provided does not support the asserted claim that he has been declared a Servant of God. If he had been then this should be easy to prove but no such reliable reference exists that I can find. If you can find one that clearly states this is true then please do do. Otherwise the claim is unreliable and must stay out of the article. Yahboo (talk) 06:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Why does it seem inappropriate for encyclopedia? Eensbooks (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi can you explain why an article from Jehovahs Witnesses website was removed from the section about Infant Baptism? If you let me know what the problem was Ican correct and re-publish. Thank you Verifyall!0 (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just reverted the exact same deliberate removal of content from 16 articles, without any explanation whatsoever, by the same newcomer, Itzcoalt (talk · contribs), that you had already warned on his Talk page on March 2020; he just keeps repeating the same thing over and over again despite the warnings. Can we please stop this guy?--GenoV84 (talk) 10:52, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Why do you feel it's necessary to threaten me? As part of Wikipedia, I can edit- without your permission. Who are you in the grand scheme of things to tell me what I can or cannot edit? Be prepared I will not hesitate to report you. Brainyack813 (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Just to let you know that, following up from our discussion at User talk:Նարեկ Համբարձումյան, I've started [5]. I appreciate your intervention with that article, but the phrasing of the link was inappropriate here. THanks. Mike Peel (talk): 14:00, 3 August 2020
Hello Elizium23. I'm trying to find my way around Wikipedia and proper etiquette on the encyclopedia. Alas, I did intentionally remove Brian Kraft's pic at his request. I will look into practices on Wikipedia. If you could point out a good YouTube account which gives solid Wikipedia editing information, that would be fantastic. Alas, I'm sure you're busy. If I have done something in error, please let me know. Much appreciated. Toolroom (talk) 01:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)