Hello, Encyclopédisme, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your nameontalk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! LizRead!Talk!03:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Encyclopédisme,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! LizRead!Talk!03:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Amaru Topa Inca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
No. Just no. Do not bother other people with your emotional states. This is a project to build an encyclopedia. It is not a free online therapy session. Refrain from disruptive editing. Cullen328 (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You did not stop. You did it again. Please consider this a final warning. Any other disruptive editing at the Teahouse or anywhere else will result in a block. Cullen328 (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cullen328: I stoped. But I thought this ain’t vandalism. It was explained to me that asking some legitimately interesting questions on the Teahouse, which are made in good faith, is not vandalism. Whatever. Encyclopédisme (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not joke.. I have the right to ask questions on the Teahouse even after what came before, right? I want to possibly move an article I created. Encyclopédisme (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you were not joking, then why the heck did you mention your boredom (or lack thereof) again? Why? Why the heck did you refer to me as "Cullin" when my username is Cullen328? You have been told quite clearly that your style of interaction at the Teahouse has irritated hosts there. Do not engage in a pattern of editing that is irritating or disrespectful to others for no good reason. Just ask your questions neutrally and in a straightforward fashion. I am very serious about this, and I hope that you will understand that. Cullen328 (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
… ok. So first, I made a good faith allusion to it (I wasn’t joking, I was making a reference to that, specifically stating I’m serious). As to your username, calm down, I thought it was Cullin or something like that when I wrote the message. I am def not getting blocked for asking how to rename a page to which I gave a name I’m not satisfied with. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 03:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you get blocked, it will not be for asking about moving a page. It will be for continuing to bother people after repeatedly being asked to stop. Cullen328 (talk) 08:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is: I didn’t continue. I can still ask a question on the Teahouse if I need something. If you don’t like it, then don’t answer. If I get blocked, it will not be for asking a question with an allusion to previous interactions. Encyclopédisme (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In other words no policy tells me I need to stop asking questions on the Teahouse, and I will continue doing so for long. But I won’t be bothering the people answering to my questions, because my questions will be legit, like the one I just asked, and because it is, like anything else, totally voluntary, if you don’t like it, then don’t bother with me. I stopped asking disruptive questions (I’d hardly call them disruptive editing already), you can leave me alone now. I won’t to it again, but I don’t think that I need to put any consequences on my actions, a block if I continue, sure, but I didn’t. I will continue to ask questions, in case I need something (that is, knowing how to do something), at the Teahouse. Cheers. Encyclopédisme (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it violating good faith? I can say that I'm laughing my ass off, right? Without correlation to the other's comments? I didn't assume anything bad of Taksen, really. Anyway, noted. Encyclopédisme (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pachacuti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be revertedordeleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
