-- 18:35, Tuesday, March 21, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
|
It is good that you asked the question before jumping right in and typing away. What I've found in the over ten years I've been here is that entries MUST be verifiable by a separate, third party source. That is to say that "XYZ Widgets" could be a world leader in widget production but if that isn't backed up by a reliable reference, it won't likely be included for long. I would say that the safest play would be to give me a heads-up here on what you're thinking about adding or simply place the help-me tag on the talk page of the article you wish to edit along with the information you wish to have included or do what you have already done and ask away at the teahouse. If there is substantial outside source info to support what you've added, it' is unlikely to be an issue. I guess that's it in a nutshell for now, it's ten to two in the morning and I am outta here for now. Again, welcome. Aloha27 talk 04:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Is there a general catch-all category for pages that have referencing issues that then links to the more specific subcategories? I'm wanting to do general reference cleanup, but there are a lot of categories in the hidden categories and tracking categories and I can't find what I'm looking for. - Galactic-Radiance (Talk) 16:36, 25 March 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]
Was trying to fix busted formatting on The Final Days, why the revert? You fix it please! 2600:1001:B014:178C:CC55:F6B1:B11C:E6AC (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I noticed an editor I blocked earlier removed the block notice I added to his page. You then reverted him, to add it back again. He's allowed to remove that; it's mostly just rejected unblock requests that users can't remove. If he removes it again, just let him. It's not worth fighting over. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Florida House Bill H-837, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center for the Study of Popular Culture. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for bringing Zeona, South Dakota, back to life, and for improving so many settlement articles. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi, you probably haven't noticed, but when you modified the infobox parameters from "demonym" to "demonyms", that gave unwanted results (the demonym isn't shown anymore) for some articles that don't use Infobox settlement directly, but through a wrapper (like {{Infobox French commune}}). See for instance Aigné and Abdera, Thrace. I changed them back, at least the ones that showed up in maintenance categories (Category:Pages using infobox French commune with unknown parameters, Category:Pages using infobox Greece place with unknown parameters, there may be more. Markussep Talk 08:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
HiGalactic-Radiance! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
|
|
HiGalactic-Radiance! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
Hi, I noticed you moving coords into the infobox. I'm not sure how you are doing that, but two or three years ago, I was working with JJMC89 to automate this. He wrote bot code to do it, and I was going do to the manual cleanup of the ones the bot couldn't move for various reasons. He had prototype code working, and then I just got sucked into something else and never got back to it. I always wanted to get back to this someday and assume he still has the code mothballed somewhere. Just mentioning this in case you are interested in the bot approach. There would be more discussion in the archives of his TP. MB 01:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You did not get a response to this question but maybe WP:VPT would be the place to ask, if you didn't find the answer anywhere else. I wouldn't know how to answer but I'm way behind reading the archives.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
