Contents

User talk:Goustien

/Archive

I have nominated Category:Fictional earldoms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Arctic WikiProject

Hi, Goustien! In light of your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Arctic-related articles, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Arctic WikiProject. The Arctic WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects that relate with the Arctic.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

Lithoderm 20:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

good luck with them. But please try to find a secondary reference--some of the books on the legends involved should discuss them.DGG (talk) 03:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to track down the constitution of Franceville to verify claims about it being the first independent state with universal suffrage. You seem to be the source of most of the Franceville information. Do you know where a copy of the constitution might be? Lalli999 (talk) 22:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I am heading the WPHC archives next month, in part to try to track down more on Franceville. Am anglophone so am struggling on the French documents side. In one of your early edits of the Franceville info on the Vanuatu history page you said that Franceville had been granted a charter of independence by France. I don't suppose you have a source for this? Lalli999 (talk) 04:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you edited List of regicides of Charles I. You might be interested to know that I am working through a list of article with copy left problems (see User:Philip Baird Shearer/BCWs copyright issues). In most cases if I can find an entry in User:Magnus Manske/Dictionary of National Biography (source) I am using that to re-populate the article but we also have a OCR version of the full article on Wikisource that can be copied (copyright expired) to create a full article as has been done for example George Fleetwood (regicide) see Dictionary of National Biography, Volume 19 Page 271 (Fleetwood) or in the case of Isaac Ewer there is a full version checked on Wikisource:Ewer, Isaac (DNB00) that was used as the source.

Before I discovered this rich source of information, I found another source for the Regicides, and although it is biased against them and uses "f" for "s" it is useful as a source "The lives of the English regicides: and other commissioners of the pretended High court of justice, appointed to sit in judgement upon their sovereign, King Charles the First" Volume II, by Mark Noble (1798), page 301-305 for Robert Wallop.

Any help you could provide filling in the dots would be appreciated. -- PBS (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a middle earth place template. Please use this instead of the fictional country one. Please see Gondor for an example. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 07:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again :-) The country box does allow flags, but to my knowledge there are no original flags out there, therefore any flag added would only be either o/r fan cruft or taken from an adaptation; and as per WP:ME consensus we try to avoid specific adaptation related material exception for the adaptation section. (for example loads of movie fan boys would have us think that frodo looks like Elijah Wood). Carl Sixsmith (talk) 07:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I wonder how much trouble it would be to alter the ME-place template. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In this discussion at WikiProject Middle-earth it was decided that we don't want too much in-universe facts in infoboxes on ME articles, so let's better represent the flags and coats of arms in the article proper. De728631 (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not to knock A Dream in Polar Fog (of which I've only read parts) but it as a historical novel, not a work of history and so probably should not qualify as a source. Also its setting is after the 19th century landings and contemporaneous with or after Bartlet and Kakatovik's ice crossing. Incidentally, Bartlet records that Kakatovik was very aware of a tradition among his people of enmity with the coastal Chukchi, perhaps a further bit of evidence for Krauss's argument. Dankarl (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From what i've seen co-directed films are not added to templates.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Goustien! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

I've started a debate here as to whether or not the images you are adding to Middle-earth articles are suitable. Please feel free to join in and put your point across. Thank you GimliDotNet ^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 07:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baronies in the Peerage of Scotland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help this week with the multimedia templates such as Template:Odyssey navbox, Template:The Time Machine, and Template:One Thousand and One Nights. I need a lot more help with these templates, which seem to be up your alley. I created almost 200 of them in the last few months, which are listed at User:TonyTheTiger/creations (see multimedia works towards the bottom of my templates section). I have not carefully selected the categories. In some instances, I may have copied the formatting of a template from a drama to a comedy or one with a novel that was the source to one derived from a play. I need help going through these. I also had problems deciding whether a lot of categories should be added. If it has a variety of adaptations do we need categories for films, tv shows, operas, ballets, video games, plays, musicals, animated cartoons, sequels, etc. Similarly, most of the talk pages remain uncreated. Should we include template tags for projects such as FILM, COMEDY, NOVELS, LITERATURE, SCREENWRITING, OPERA, BALLET, THEATRE, MUSICAL THEATRE, VIDEO GAMES, ETC. I think they all should be tagged with WP:WFs tag plus a few of these.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 10:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Native American children's writers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 07:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of {{The Pickwick Papers}}, I thought you might be interested in the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the leading editor in terms of edit count of {{The Adventures of Tom Sawyer}}, I am alerting you to the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates. We are discussing whether they should be removed from or collapsed or left alone in the author's articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Giddy.goat.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but fail to see how Indonesia/Dutch East Indies - normally as South East Asia, can be considered in its entirity to be in Oceania? Any rationale for that inclusion? satusuro 09:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Phillipines or Dutch East Indies in the colonial era can be considered what is the generally accepted scope of Oceania - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oceania - stretching the scope to no benefit for the reader - only confusing the issue... satusuro 09:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

if only it was that simple. often in texts in the 1700s to even 1940s the east indies can apply to spanish, dutch, british possessions in that era and area (Dutch east indies etc...).

current specificities Oceania doesnt touch Indonesia, and confined to New Guinea at furthest... current specificities Southeast Asia contains Indonesia and Philipines

oceania is a recent term 1830s + Pacific bit older early 1600s,

oceania in the oed = islands of the pacific and adjacent seas.... I have endless arguments in the years past about whether any of the seas within Indonesia/NEI are in fact linked to the Pacific or Indian... what a time waster that was

It could be argued endlessly like the Australasian and Malay peninsula arguments of old, whether the wallace line is a better point of separation, or the international maritime organisation determinations....

For simplicity, brevity and saving time and space I would suggest that Oceania is, limited strictly, and the rest is south east asia. But it is a suggestion alone, and it seems for some it would be red rags to a bull, vast amounts of blah blah filling talk pages everywhere.... In the end, a simple oceania, would be my preference...but then, who am i to say?

I do not think dutch east indies should be included in oceania because of dutch west papua... it is a small part and imho should not be used as an excuse to add the larger entity satusuro 15:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you nominated the categories of Muslim communities by continent/country for discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 August 5, you tagged all the sub-category pages correctly, but did not list them at the CFD discussion page. When you nominate multiple categories, you have to (i) start the nomination with one of the categories and save the page, then (ii) edit the discussion to manually add the others.

Note that I have relisted the discussions and done this for you today at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 November 8. You may wish to comment there. – Fayenatic London 17:47, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family tree of the Norse gods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family tree of the Norse gods until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nineteen Eighty-Four locations, which you created, has been nominated for upmergingtoCategory:Nineteen Eighty-Four. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your editorial involvement in {{Alice}} I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits:

• (diff | hist) . . Patag island‎; 03:36 . . (-31)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Panata island‎; 03:36 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Pagasa Island‎; 03:35 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Likas island‎; 03:35 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Lawak island‎; 03:35 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Kota island‎; 03:35 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Balagtas Reef‎; 03:34 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)
• (diff | hist) . . Ayungin Reef‎; 03:34 . . (-32)‎ . . ‎Goustien (talk | contribs)‎ (This is a redirect page to an existing article which is already in the mentioned category.)

Why do you find it a problem that these foreign language redirects are also in the category? Pdfpdf (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response acknowledged with thanks. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barony of Caux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barony of Caux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that over time you have added various templates to article categories. However, per WP:CAT#T, templates should only be categorised in template categories. --woodensuperman 12:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Woodensuperman, I was not aware of this policy. I will remember in future. Goustien (talk) 16:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit, you added a phylogenetic tree to the article Ethiopian wolf. It includes a reference "ref name=lindblad2005", but unfortunately this reference is not defined, and is generating an error message. It is reference number 20 as the article now stands. Are you able to recall the reference and add it to the article please? DuncanHill (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The same tree with references is used in several canid articles.Goustien (talk) 03:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please also add fictional towns of the following Tv series The Flash, Arrow ,Supergirl ,Charmed (2018 tv series ) to the list of Fictional towns on Television Series. Thank You. Blessed Be. Asandaxulu (talk) 14:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Intergenerational transmission. Since you had some involvement with the Intergenerational transmission redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hill people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

You contributed to this article some time ago. You may want to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill people. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mafrica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFICTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see that a number of times you have re-created an article after deletion as a result of a deletion discussion, and then immediately made it into a redirect, evidently in order to restore a copy of the deleted article to the editing history. I don't know what your purpose in doing so is, but there are at least two reasons why you shouldn't. (1) If the outcome of a deletion discussion is to delete the article (and not redirecting it while keeping the history) then that is what should happen. If you think there are good reasons why the outcome of the discussion should be overturned, then the thing to do is to take it to a deletion review, not just ignore the outcome of the discussion and unilaterally overturn it. (2) Wikipedia's licensing terms require attribution of all content, which is achieved by keeping a history list of all edits. By posting content without restoring that editing history you are violating copyright, so you must not do it. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 12:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Dragonriders of Pern locations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Middle-earth roads. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15#Middle-earth roads until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Khemed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Husdent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luggnagg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works set in the 29th century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goustien, I have commented out Krusenstern Reef on Krusenstern. There are currently no articles that mention the reef and references aren't used on DAB pages (since DABs should only reflect existing content). Hopefully someone can add the commented-out material to an existing article. Leschnei (talk) 15:01, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional comets has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]