Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:27, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Copyediting: You contributed to the copyediting page, and now after several users' contributions I'm trying to clarify whether the entry should really be under copyediting (I think probably so) or copy editor or what--see Talk:Copy editing. Your input welcome! Elf 17:57, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Please don't move articles to disambiguation pages (as you just did with lens) around without discussing them first on the talk page; it's usual practice to keep the primary meaning of the term as the main article, with secondary meanings off of the (disambiguation) page. Now everything that links to lens goes through a redirect (considered bad form), and I can't move it back with "move page" because lens itself isn't blank. -- DrBob 16:49, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Point taken - sorry - mea culpa. But you can hardly argue that the optical-instrument sense is the primary meaning of "lens". Can you? -- Hugh2414 22:19, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You may want to take another editing pass at Ghosts (play): I didn't intentionally omit anything in the recent edit conflict. It's all yours for now. -- Nunh-huh 02:04, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Added category physician to your userpage. Hope I am not mistaken. --Nomen Nescio 03:32, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
Hi there! There is a link to meta-analysis section. What futhur statements and links do you consider for that? Send them to me, or post them on the talk page of systmatic review section Thanks huji 17:26, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Could you please review this draft I've prepared for "dilated cardiomyopathy" section, and give your suggestions?
Talk:Dilated_cardiomyopathy
Thanks
huji 13:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Of course I liked the changes you made (ref. Expand, copy-edit, ....!) Good luck huji—TALK 11:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I merged three articles (Moose, Elk and cow-elk) into one, so if I put anything in, it was as a cut-and-paste. I've no idea if the swan meaning is true or not. jimfbleak 14:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]You may wish to comment on the discussion on this page. jimfbleak 06:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.
We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
wijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.
DiptanshuTalk 14:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]
