Contents

User talk:Jax 0677

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As is the case on album articles in general, Duality (Lindsey Stirling album) does not need a source for the track list. I've pointed this out to you at least once before, if I'm not mistaken. The album itself is always understood to be the source. Only bonus tracks on deluxe editions/reissues need to be sourced. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I wanted to reach out about your recent edit to the Stigma (Wage War album) article. You added a reference tag for the personnel section, but I wanted to point you to WP:PERSONNEL.

Credits for albums, including personnel and track listing, are assumed to come from the liner notes or official credits on streaming services (such as Tidal or Spotify). These sections only need references for additional contributors that are not included in those credits, but that isn't the case here. Sock (tock talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Indiana University Indianapolis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly referenced page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you make this edit to Kris Kross? If the album has an article, which it does, then it doesn't also need a citation just to prove that it exists. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, Best of Kris Kross Remixed '92 '94 '96 has zero references. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That still doesn't mean you need a citation just to prove the album exists in another article. That's not how sourcing works. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, the album needs to be sourced somewhere. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How about in the article itself and not in another one? Someone else has already fixed it by redirecting and adding a source in Kris Kross proper. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, you have just proven my point, that it needed to be sourced in Kris Kross, or the album article, which was not the case until I tagged it. --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]